What constitutes a large record collection?

Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by ANALOGUE OR DEATH, Jan 18, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ANALOGUE OR DEATH

    ANALOGUE OR DEATH Forum Resident Thread Starter

    Location:
    HULL ENGLAND
    No right thinking person considers downloads or any music held on 'gigabites' as a collection surely.You own nothing!
     
  2. ANALOGUE OR DEATH

    ANALOGUE OR DEATH Forum Resident Thread Starter

    Location:
    HULL ENGLAND

    Oh yes!!!!
     
  3. 86mets

    86mets Counting Crows #1 Fan

    I have over 11K CDs in my collection...but the part that I find daunting is trying to listen to the 4.5K that I haven't been able to listen to yet...so it really isn't doing me much good to have so many when I can't enjoy almost half of it...I find myself being much more particular about the new ones I add fearing I won't be able to listen to them anyway...at 54 years of age I hope I live long enough to say that I was able to listen to everything...I have about 200 box sets that haven't been listened to either...
     
  4. ANALOGUE OR DEATH

    ANALOGUE OR DEATH Forum Resident Thread Starter

    Location:
    HULL ENGLAND
    You live the life of a king my friend.
     
    Long Live Analog and lightbulb like this.
  5. pscreed

    pscreed Upstanding Member

    Location:
    Land of the Free
    Go big or go home :)

    No seriously it's relative. I think 7500 LPs is a lot more than 7500 CDs for some reason. And I'm a CD guy. I have more than 10k digital discs - actually at this point I think it might be a lot more. And obviously my wife, my friends, and people I've never met on the internet think I'm bat**** insane.

    I've still got a couple thousand "vinyls" but when I meet a guy with a well curated 7500 LP collection, in my mind that's a pretty darn serious collection...

    So all due respect OP, good thread.
     
    Vinyl_Blues and TonyACT like this.
  6. bluesky

    bluesky Senior Member

    Location:
    south florida, usa
    I'd rather have 300 pristine (M-) LPs than 1500 not pristine.

    But that's just me.
     
  7. ANALOGUE OR DEATH

    ANALOGUE OR DEATH Forum Resident Thread Starter

    Location:
    HULL ENGLAND
    For god's sake don't put that into my head!
     
  8. Holy Diver

    Holy Diver Senior Member

    Location:
    USA
    Back in the 80's, I thought it was ten cassettes. :)
     
  9. bluesky

    bluesky Senior Member

    Location:
    south florida, usa
    Back in the 80's, I thought it was 300 cassettes! :)

    Still kept 60 of the best in a wooden cassette rack. Haven't played them in 2 decades.
     
    Runicen and Kristofa like this.
  10. Arkay_East

    Arkay_East Forum Resident

    Location:
    ATX
    I have always considered 1K a "large" collection. It's a nice round number and it's 10X 100 records! I mean come ON!

    Now that I have surpassed that number it still seems about right. Obtainable for the average person but still requires some dedication. Just my $.02
     
    Gavinyl, TonyACT and troyvod like this.
  11. Stu02

    Stu02 Forum Resident

    Location:
    Canada
    I started buying records in a big way when I was 16. Boxing Day sales at Sam the Record Man ( RIP) . I distinctly recall my dad looking me in the eye saying if all your summer job cash goes to that I hope you will still be into this 10 years from now. That was 1979. I did not sell off during the dark painful purge years when digital forces took over the empire. ( I bought those too ).
    I'm at about 900 lps and about half that on cd and MP3.
     
    AJK74 and Paully like this.
  12. lightbulb

    lightbulb Not the Brightest of the Bunch

    Location:
    Smogville CA USA
    I'm sure many of us here are willing to help you of your dire predicament!
     
    Runicen likes this.
  13. lightbulb

    lightbulb Not the Brightest of the Bunch

    Location:
    Smogville CA USA
    Since "large" is a relatively vague term, let's use the individual owner as the gauge:
    IF you have lost the ability to honestly recall whether a certain release/pressing in a given media (CD/LP) is in your collection, then is IS TOO LARGE.
    (I may have almost reached that tipping point..Almost.)
     
    pinkrudy likes this.
  14. dkmonroe

    dkmonroe A completely self-taught idiot

    Location:
    Atlanta
    I think a "large" collection is anything over 1000. I have somewhere between 300-500 LP's and many more CD's and other digital disks of various format. Personally I want to maintain a small to medium LP collection of good copies of things I really want to listen to. I'm not interested in having a huge collection.
     
  15. lightbulb

    lightbulb Not the Brightest of the Bunch

    Location:
    Smogville CA USA
    Actually, living on a second floor apartment, I've occasionally wondered if my LP/CD collection was potential grounds for haphazardly endangering the tenant's lives that lived on the first floor below... :oops: :cry: :sigh:
     
    Anonamemouse likes this.
  16. DLD

    DLD Senior Member

    Location:
    Dallas, Tx
    Until last Friday, I'd a thought my ~2,000 collection of LPs was "large". However, I met a guy to sell him some jazz records, he said he had ~20,000:yikes: I've reclassified mine as "respectable" sized.
     
    SandAndGlass likes this.
  17. Pizza

    Pizza With extra pepperoni

    Location:
    USA
    More than three.
     
    strummer101 likes this.
  18. Mr.Sneis

    Mr.Sneis Forum Resident

    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    I feel guilty, I think I'm nearing the 300 mark which seems large in our storage limited house.
     
  19. dajokr

    dajokr Classical "Mega" Box Set Collector

    Location:
    Virginia Beach, VA
    Well, my Musicbee tells me I have 3238 separate "albums", a good number of which are multi-disc or box sets, so I would wager that's well over 5000. I also have about 80 classical "mega" box sets (at least 25 CDs, most closer to 50 or more), so that is roughly 4000 more. Add in single classical CDs which I have not ripped, and I'm probably over 10K CDs. I have less than 100 LPs (that's the next project).

    I consider mine to be a large collection, but a small library.
     
    TonyACT and Vinyl_Blues like this.
  20. Vinyl_Blues

    Vinyl_Blues Slave to the Groove

    Location:
    Chicago, IL USA
    There are interesting comments here regarding a related question, which is "What is too large of a collection?"

    That also has a subjective answer, but here's my opinion: There's too much wonderful music in this world to ever say "That's it, I will never discover another new album for the rest of my life." And even if you feel like you already own all that interests you, there's always tons of new music being created. And even if you only get into 1% of what is newly released, that's still a helluva lot of new albums to buy.

    So I'd say my collection will never be too large simply because music is too amazing to ever be done buying and discovering it.

    FWIW: My vinyl collection stand at 1269 LPs, 100 45s, and about 60 CDs.
     
    notesofachord likes this.
  21. Criminy pete

    Criminy pete Forum Resident

    Location:
    Eugene, OR
    I'd say 2,000 and over. (They hàve to be in B+ and over condition or they don't count)
     
  22. Kristofa

    Kristofa Enthusiast of small convenient sound carrier units

    Location:
    usa
    Were the racks the old Napa Valley ones? I had two of the 100 ct. ones and two plastic recycle bins full of vinyl (plus about 50 CDs), and I had the most music out of all my friends. When I see some of those old photos of myself in front of my "large" collection in '91, it seems so odd.
     
  23. RHCD

    RHCD Reverend Bong

    OK, I did some measuring and counting and estimating. The ongoing purge has now got rid of 5 whole feet of LPs that were either in poor condition, poor recordings, or music I really never wanted to hear again. We are down to about 2300 from a peak of about 3000 LPs. It's not as many as I thought, my mental estimate of about 5K was way off. I was never in the big league, but it seems I'm not even in the medium league. A small-time collector. I'll pipe down - and tell the wife it's NOT a large record collection by any means.
     
    TonyACT likes this.
  24. TonyACT

    TonyACT Boxed-in!

    I think it's large - but PERHAPS she will believe you ;)
     
  25. Dubmart

    Dubmart Senior Member

    Location:
    Bristol, England
    On a serious note a building would really have to have existing severe structural issues to not be able to support a lot of records evenly distributed along walls with wall fixings for example, having said that I have seen cases where too may records have been stored upstairs and the floor has started to bulge alarmingly so it does happen, but at least your neighbours will likely have a warning rather than a sudden critical failure perhaps best to check your insurance policy anyway. The best upstairs space I ever saw was a 1970s built commercial unit that appeared to have reinforced concrete floors, records stacked floor to ceiling and right across the space rather than just along the walls, plus it was fireproof as a bonus, I really envied that space.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

molar-endocrine