Led Zeppelin: Original CDs vs Remasters

Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by Big A2, Dec 16, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ManFromCouv

    ManFromCouv Employee #3541

    Maybe it was an honest typo. :shrug:

    The T and the P are only...what...5 keys apart?
     
  2. ricks

    ricks Senior Member

    Location:
    127.0.0.1:443

    Compression during mastering produces the illusion of greater detail at the expense of dynamic range and natural lifelike sound. Nothing wrong with preferring either.

    Mothership was sourced from the same digital tape as the remasters. The only difference was copious amount of compression during mastering and the EQ'd used on Mothership. FWIW I think the remasters are far far better than Mothership, but not the originals.

    As for the Mothershi* comment - get a sense of humor!
     
  3. eelkiller

    eelkiller One of the great unwashed

    Location:
    Northern Ontario
    Missing cough, reversed channels, the originals were not always "right"
     
    905 likes this.
  4. Holy Diver

    Holy Diver Senior Member

    Location:
    USA
    Some people like that original "old" 80s CD sound, and sometimes that is the best one, but I think most of the Zep sound better from a later date.
     
  5. They should transfer the original analogue master tapes to 24bit/96khz or 24bit/192khz and master them from those transfers and then release them all in high resolution on Blu-ray. Even then some people will still proberly moan about them. You can never satisfy everybody.
     
  6. inperson

    inperson Senior Member

    Location:
    Ohio
    I like both versions of each. None of them are 'bad'. They aren't hard to obtain and they aren't expensive either. Win/win for everyone :)

    But I like the originals a tad more because they are some of the earliest cd's I bought and still have.
     
  7. appledan

    appledan Resident Rockist

    Location:
    Ohio
    My copy of the original PG does have the cough. IRC, the non-cough versions were the Japan pressings. And only some batches of the originals had reversed channels. Not all of them did.
     
  8. eelkiller

    eelkiller One of the great unwashed

    Location:
    Northern Ontario
    That was my point, they were not all perfect. I have corrected copies and do enjoy them FWIW.
     
  9. appledan

    appledan Resident Rockist

    Location:
    Ohio
    They can transfer the analog tapes to 24/96 or 24/192 'til the cows come home, but that isn't going to prevent compressing the life out of them.
     
  10. steveharris

    steveharris Senior Member

    Location:
    Mass
    Listening to some recent AF gold cds, I gotta say Hoffmanate`em all for Audio Fidelity,warts and all.

    I picked case by case.
     
  11. Andreas

    Andreas Senior Member

    Location:
    Frankfurt, Germany
  12. apileocole

    apileocole Lush Life Gort

    Case by case.
     
  13. I thought compression wasn't so much of an issue with high resolution Blu-ray audio? I maybe wrong... I don't know.
     
  14. Big A2

    Big A2 Forum Resident Thread Starter

    He's talking about dynamic compression.
     
  15. So does high resolution music on Blu-ray have the same problem as CD's do with regards to dynamic compression to make music sound louder?
     
  16. Big A2

    Big A2 Forum Resident Thread Starter

    I think so. DVD-As certainly do. Until some rules can be put in place and enforced, hyper-compression will exist as long as digital mediums exist.
     
  17. It certainly could happen. The few releases I have heard so far don't have this problem:

    Tom Petty - Mojo
    Tom Petty - Damn the Torpedos
    Neil Young - Archives Vol. 1
    Neil Young - Le Noise
     
  18. It's case by case for me. I've got original records. I've got original CDs. I've got remastered CDs. They all sound pretty good on my stereo. Some of the records sound better than the CDs and vice-versa. I go with whichever is within easy reach!:cheers:
     
  19. I would love to hear the Led Zeppelin albums in 24/96 high resolution on Blu-ray, but I'm not holding out much hope.
     
  20. The original IV sounds very muddy and hissy to me. The remaster of IV has more detail and less hiss.
     
  21. Myke

    Myke Trying Not To Spook The Horse

    I-32XD/ Original Vinyl
    II-GP Vinyl / Double RL Vinyl / 32XD
    III-US Diament Mastering / Original Vinyl / Classic 200g Vinyl
    IV-Original Vinyl / Swiss CD / Japan 20P2 " Symbols "
    Houses Of The Holy - Original Vinyl / Target CD WG
    Physical Graffiti-Remastered CD w/cough
    Presence-Original Vinyl / Diament Mastered US CD
    In Through The Out Door - Original Vinyl
    Coda - Remastered CD

    :shtiphat:
     
  22. drbryant

    drbryant Senior Member

    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    I only have the remasters for IV, Physical Graffiti and ITTOD, and prefer the original CD's.
     
  23. The Japanese vinyl replica CD's are even slightly louder than the standard remastered versions.
     
  24. attym

    attym Forum Resident

    Location:
    US
    This is interesting, I assumed the 1990 remasters/complete box set was the same mastering used on mothership/japanese mini lp CDs.... But they're not?

    I'll do some more reading.
     
  25. The first batch of Japanese mini-LP's feature the mastering of the Complete Studio Recordings box set or the individual remastered albums on single CD's. Later Japanese mini-LP's have slightly boosted levels.

    If you like the remasters (I think they are quite good for some of the albums, but mostly prefer the originals), I think the first batch of Japanese mini-LP's are the most desirable version. Nice thick cardboard and not further boosted levels, combined with good manufacturing quality. I have the complete set and am happy I have them.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

molar-endocrine