Why Are The Stones Boring Live After 1970?

Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by Gersh, Dec 19, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Gersh

    Gersh Forum Resident Thread Starter

    Thanks for that because while as OP I can (obviously) say what I feel about it, I am under no mistake about the greatness of the Stones. But something changed after Sticky Fingers in a fundamental way. But I like hearing what people think about it. For example, Brussels seems too fast to me, as if the band are on something, it sounds rushed and frenetic. Sure that can be exciting live but as an aural document, at least what I've heard, it doesn't do it. Elements of the playing of course will always be good (Charlie, Taylor, sometimes Keith) but something became fixed in the live playing from about '72, kind of a stadium feel including in Mick's singing (more monotone, the shouting due to running onstage), whereas I don't think Ya-Ya's sounds like a stadium album. It sounds like a ballroom album played in a stadium, which is different, a real performance, not a show.
     
  2. ash1

    ash1 Forum Resident

    Location:
    bristol uk
    I think this was a really big problem. He also starts shouting rather than what he did before. Sometimes the sloppiness of the band works great but Mick's vocals are not good. I thought on the most recent tours (2013 etc.) he was really excellent.
     
  3. KipB

    KipB Forum Resident

    Location:
    Bethel, CT, USA
    Because you don't like them.
     
  4. Dave Hoos

    Dave Hoos Nothing is revealed

    I actually like Goat's Head Soup more than anything that came after it.
     
  5. Dave Hoos

    Dave Hoos Nothing is revealed

    I've listened to it and watched the DVD many times. Boring it certainly isn't.

    What it also isn't is the best live performances they ever gave. Not even close. Doesn't come close to the '69-'73 performances.

    It's probably the best performances they ever gave with Ronnie Wood...it's not the same thing.
     
  6. Hagstrom

    Hagstrom Please stop calling them vinyls.

    The Stones are easily my favorite band, and I see them as often as I can. Always brilliant in concert, always sounding great. This thread is worthless.

    Time to get on the Love Train!

     
    George Blair and Carserguev like this.
  7. ShawnX

    ShawnX Forum Resident

    Location:
    Detroit, Michigan
    I think I see or hear what your getting at here. Those pre-1970 shows...the band and sound was still being formed. Now Mick has to be "Mick Jagger" and run and shout about the stage or the audience will be disappointed.

    And Keith does it too. He now just plays at being "Keith" rather then being the player he could be.

    So I think I understand, However...those 1973 and 1975 show are still great.

    And the 1978 show have a level of artistry between Keith and Ronnie that went to a whole new level. The playing on Beast of Burden or Far Away Eyes is so pure and sloppy and beautiful.

    Faster...yes. Respectable is so fast. I just love it. It's almost punk. These old dogs showed the new kids how to play it fast and sloppy. Again, I wouldn't change a second.

    Now after 1980 I do think they became big stadium show and raced through Jumping Jack Flash. They still had flashes of the old charms but something changed after 1980.
     
  8. Linto

    Linto Mayor of Simpleton

    I refer to my earlier answer on The Who

    Cash

    Cocaine

    Women

    one or more of the above.
     
  9. Dave Hoos

    Dave Hoos Nothing is revealed

    While I certainly agree that the Stones' performances dropped in quality, in my opinion it happened after Mick Taylor left, not while he was still there.

    The '69 live stuff was the best the Stones had ever sounded (in my opinion) up 'til then...but the '72 shows are even better. They had even better material to add to their shows and their best ever line-up had been playing together for 3 years and were on fire. The '73 tour is great too, but not quite at the same level.

    To my ears anyway.
     
    John Fell likes this.
  10. ShawnX

    ShawnX Forum Resident

    Location:
    Detroit, Michigan
    To each his own...if I had a time machine and could see one Rolling Stones show, I'd pick the Stones at the Masonic Temple in 1978 Detroit, Michigan.
     
  11. Gersh

    Gersh Forum Resident Thread Starter


    Good comments. However, Respectable to me is just a bad song, so dull compared to the great singles of the mid- and late-60's (to '71).
     
    ShawnX likes this.
  12. Gersh

    Gersh Forum Resident Thread Starter

    Well, glad you think that's great. I don't. I never really liked the Stones versions of soul classics, e.g. Just My Imagination. Clunky and dull. (The backing vocalists here are great, it's their song really).

    The Stones are, or were, a bluesy rock band, also a pop rock band. Their greatest work was in genres directly influenced by blues, R&B and folk (and country). Their efforts at 70's soul, disco and reggae were never very good.

    As always, there are exceptions. Mick's solo performance a couple of years ago at an awards show was very good, he sang a soul classic (can't recall name). Also the Stones outtake of Drift Away from the 70's is very good, it could have been huge hit for them with a little further work and production. I'd have released that instead of stuff like Miss You. That could have been as good as Wild Horses, or some of their folkish mid-60's work.
     
    paulg61 likes this.
  13. milankey

    milankey Forum Resident

    Location:
    Kent, Ohio, USA
    I still like watching dvd's of the Stones, don't care for anymore live audio recordings.
     
  14. Ellsworth

    Ellsworth Forum Resident

    I am not the Stones expert that some are but the big stadium shows with songs played at a super-fast pace don't do anything for me. That is the dividing line for me - not 1970.
     
    Dave Hoos likes this.
  15. vinyldreams

    vinyldreams Forum Resident

    Location:
    Main St.
    What a killer rock n roll riff. My only complaint is they didn't play this song more often. This is just a one off, they rarely played this tune live.
     
    bonus, footlooseman and John Fell like this.
  16. fcmu

    fcmu Rock'n Roll Will Never Die

    Location:
    Weiden (Germany)
    Boring after Mick Taylor has left the Band. The shows from 69, 72 are pretty good. 1973 outstanding!
     
    John Fell likes this.
  17. Django

    Django Forum Resident

    Location:
    Dublin, Ireland
    I'm a stones fan....up to a point. They've always sounded under rehearsed live, it's just hanging together, but that's their thing.
     
  18. Gersh

    Gersh Forum Resident Thread Starter

    I'm sure there's a handful of performances or even shows after the early 70's that are first rate, I don't want to be dogmatic. I like this a lot:



    Perhaps because released from the Stones format Mick really shines here, it's all great.
     
  19. Dave Hoos

    Dave Hoos Nothing is revealed

    Although, I have noticed that they have taken most of the songs back to their regular tempo, over the last 2-3 years. As a result, the shows I've heard (and one that I've seen) over that time are a massive improvement over the bulk of the last 20-25 years.

    "Goddammit Swearengen...I don't trust you as far as I can throw you, but I enjoy the way you lie!"
     
    Ellsworth likes this.
  20. Gersh

    Gersh Forum Resident Thread Starter


    I think that's a very good point. With a virtuoso like Mick Taylor, that deficiency was minimized.
     
    John Fell likes this.
  21. Gersh

    Gersh Forum Resident Thread Starter


    I agree with you, that is part of it, they let the tempos slide for decades, making the songs sound dull and uninspiring. On the last tours they were following the studio arrangements much more closely.
     
  22. stevepafford

    stevepafford Well-Known Member

    I really liked that tour they did when Jagger was wearing all the Lycra and footie gear and they played all their best known compositions like Going To A Go Go
     
    bonus and JimSpark like this.
  23. joethomas1

    joethomas1 Forum Resident

    Location:
    West Yorkshire, UK
    I think they started to go downhill around 1990, when they had a keyboard player and a vegas style horn section, plus they lost Wyman post 1994
     
    Dave Hoos likes this.
  24. Dave Hoos

    Dave Hoos Nothing is revealed

    Thanks. I needed a laugh.
     
    stevepafford and bonus like this.
  25. Django

    Django Forum Resident

    Location:
    Dublin, Ireland
    I'm glad they're still around but let's face it, they're well past it.
     
    Gersh likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

molar-endocrine