Poll: Favorite James Bond film

Discussion in 'Visual Arts' started by marke, Mar 22, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. junk

    junk Hellion

    Location:
    St. Louis
    I agree there.
     
  2. junk

    junk Hellion

    Location:
    St. Louis
    Same here. :agree:
     
    Slokes likes this.
  3. junk

    junk Hellion

    Location:
    St. Louis
    Mine too! I have two different ones. One is the big band theme and the other is the guitar theme.
     
  4. Ronm1

    Ronm1 Forum Resident

    Location:
    NH
    Not the only one, just the .0001%
     
  5. Ronm1

    Ronm1 Forum Resident

    Location:
    NH
    I watched them all again a few months ago. My opinion hasn't changed and for the same reason.
    Its 'Dr. No'
    If that turned out to be a bust, then no From Russia with Love or Goldfinger. No series, it would have died
     
    Richard--W, Bobby Buckshot and junk like this.
  6. Vidiot

    Vidiot Now in 4K HDR!

    Location:
    Hollywood, USA
    No, generally all there are are behind-the-scenes shots, interviews with the filmmakers and actors, and so on. I agree, it'd be interesting if the studios and the Broccoli family (Eon Productions) would dive into the vault and release all the cut scenes from the various Bond films. Watch them do this when all the Bond films are inevitably released in 4K... :eek:

    I don't completely agree with you, but I've said many times that I thought the first 20 minutes of Thunderball was the best segment of a Bond film ever -- the jet pack, the guy getting electrocuted at the SPECTRE meeting, the whole thing. Just fantastic. But once the underwater scenes start happening, it gets boring very quickly. It would've worked much better as a straight 100-hour movie, not a 130-minute boring mess. Thunderball is at least half an hour too long.
     
    Slokes likes this.
  7. Oatsdad

    Oatsdad Oat, Biscuits, Abbie & Mitzi: Best Dogs Ever

    Location:
    Alexandria VA
    You want 100 hours of "Thunderball"? That's crazy talk! :D

    Though I'd be happy with 100 hours of this:

    [​IMG]

    Or this:

    [​IMG]

    :love:
     
  8. Vidiot

    Vidiot Now in 4K HDR!

    Location:
    Hollywood, USA
    Well, if they had another 5-6 minutes of Goldfinger or You Only Live Twice or From Russia with Love or even the later films, I don't think anybody would sweat it.

    BTW, I hear they're frantically working on the editing of SPECTRE, which is a troubled film. I hope they can get it together by November, when the film opens...
     
  9. Bobby Buckshot

    Bobby Buckshot Heavy on the grease please

    Location:
    Southeastern US
    I hope you mean minutes because if you do - in fact - mean hours, I'm worried for you...seriously worried. o_O :crazy:

    All kidding aside, I completely agree with your assessment on the first part of that movie. It's tight, it's suspenseful and it's got action. As for underwater fight scenes, if they never put them in another Bond movie, I'd be happy. Actually, would be happy for no underwater scenes at all. Recently watched the Nolte film The Deep and I swear almost a good hour of that movie is ruined by underwater scenes (well, except for the opening scene, which is just...classic).
     
  10. Bobby Buckshot

    Bobby Buckshot Heavy on the grease please

    Location:
    Southeastern US
    Dr No surprised me when I recently re-watched it. Tight, noir-style film with limited gadgets and a lot of mystery and probably my favorite of Connery. The ending was a bit of a letdown, although I was cracking up when Bond was walking around in the lair with that radiation suit on, obviously pretending to blend in. It's a scene ripe for spoofing (I'm sure someone's done it before).
     
    Richard--W likes this.
  11. alexpop

    alexpop Power pop + other bad habits....

    Beggars belief !!!
    What no for votes Olga ?
     
  12. Vidiot

    Vidiot Now in 4K HDR!

    Location:
    Hollywood, USA
    Sorry, a late-night typo -- minutes it is.

    I worked on both versions of that movie (extended version and theatrical cut), and both are very, very, very long. The studio was desperately hoping for another Jaws sensation, and it didn't quite happen.

    The underwater John Barry music also got tedious after awhile. He did brilliant work under some circumstances -- I think the score for On Her Majesty's Secret Service was stellar -- but sometimes the music of the later films sounded derivative and draggy.
     
    Bobby Buckshot likes this.
  13. SecondHandNews

    SecondHandNews Forum Resident

    Location:
    PA, USA
    I can't choose. One of these three:

    From Russia With Love
    The Living Daylights
    GoldenEye


    shocked at how many votes Casino Royale got.
     
    lbangs likes this.
  14. SecondHandNews

    SecondHandNews Forum Resident

    Location:
    PA, USA
    What about the two Dalton films?
     
    lbangs likes this.
  15. alexpop

    alexpop Power pop + other bad habits....

    Shoot' brain fart typo.
    What no votes for Olga ?
     
  16. Dude111

    Dude111 An Awesome Dude

    Location:
    US
    Why could you only vote for one??

    I have many I love!!
     
  17. Rocker

    Rocker Senior Member

    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Bobby Buckshot likes this.
  18. toptentwist

    toptentwist Forum Resident

    Location:
    Houston, TX
    I was swapping TV channels last night and I noticed that "Dr. No" was on followed by two more recent flicks (one was "Die Another Day" - I forget the other).

    I turned in to "Dr. No". I've never watched it all the way thru... and alas, I couldn't do it this time either - because I tuned in too late.

    Looks like the same three titles will be repeated several times on the same channel this week (UHD - or Universal HD - I think).

    I was very impressed with how good the "Dr. No" print looked. For some reason, I expected black and white. Was "Dr. No" the second in the series or first ?

    The bikini scene with Ursula Andress is most definitely worth its legendary status.

    I fell asleep at some point and woke up when the later titles were airing... they were far too noisy in comparison. Just constant special effect noise (gun shots, explosions, etc). The older title actually had the famous guitar instrumental in a scene in the middle of the movie. I'm used to that only being used briefly - like during the gun barrel thing at the intro.
     
  19. AztecChimera

    AztecChimera Forum Resident

    Dr. No was the first. It was chosen because it had only one location (Jamaica) thus making it cheaper to film than, say, Thunderball.
     
  20. lbangs

    lbangs Senior Member

    One of my favorite characteristics of Dr. No is how much it feels like a detective movie rather than a flat-out action film.

    Shalom, y'all!

    L. Bangs
     
    Richard--W and Bobby Buckshot like this.
  21. Richard--W

    Richard--W Forum Resident

    [​IMG]


    I was torn between voting for DR NO or ON HER MAJESTY'S SECRET SERVICE.

    I went with DR. NO. It's one of the best films ever made by the British. Imaginative, innovative, bold. A milestone. Expertly directed and superbly written. Sean Connery is brilliant in it. He's everything James Bond should be, intelligent yet blunt, cruel yet compassionate, suave and romantic, gracefully athletic, dangerously dedicated. And he's the only authentic 007 because he's the only actor who had the advantage of conferencing with Ian Fleming.

    This is what James Bond looks like:

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2015
  22. tkl7

    tkl7 Agent Provocateur

    Location:
    Lewis Center, OH
    I am surprised there aren't more votes for The Spy Who Loved Me - I always thought that was one of the best, if not the best, of the Moore films.
     
    Clipper Sylvania likes this.
  23. Monosterio

    Monosterio Forum Resident

    Location:
    South Florida
    Connery: Goldfinger
    Moore: The Spy Who Loved Me
    Craig: Casino Royale (Skyfall a close second)
    Other: On Her Majesty's Secret Service
     
  24. Oatsdad

    Oatsdad Oat, Biscuits, Abbie & Mitzi: Best Dogs Ever

    Location:
    Alexandria VA
    And I would agree:

    http://www.dvdmg.com/spywholovedmeue.shtml

    However, the best Moore doesn't compete with the best Connery, which is why "SWLM" isn't getting more votes...
     
  25. Richard--W

    Richard--W Forum Resident

    The Spy Who Loved Me looks spectacular; the camerawork by Claude Renoir is immaculate.

    But I have zero tolerance for the film. It was a serious misstep in tone and approach. Jaws just ruins it. Jaws undermines the viability of the whole thing. An indestructible giant with stainless steel teeth played for laughs takes me out of the story and makes me aware I'm watching a very stupid movie. Before anyone compares him with Oddjob, remember that Oddjob was vulnerable and could be beaten; he wasn't required to be superhuman. So long as Jaws is involved there is no suspense, no sense of risk or danger, no suspension of disbelief. From that point on the film turns into self-parody and slapstick to such a degree that Bond ceases to have any value or believability as drama, as character interaction, as an action - espionage thriller. They make a steaming pile out of it. A lot of Bond fans in the summer of 1977 were pretty disgusted with the producers when they saw what had been done to the franchise, even as the film misled a whole new generation into thinking that a James Bond film was supposed to be like a Pink Panther extravaganza.

    Take away Jaws and the second ending and there might be a James Bond film in all that mess.
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2015
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

molar-endocrine