Ortofon Concorde for Technics 1200

Discussion in 'Audio Hardware' started by gss, Mar 17, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. gss

    gss Forum Resident Thread Starter

    Location:
    New Jersey
    Hello, all:

    I'm pleased to report that, just today, I purchased a super-clean Technics 1200 MKII from 2004. The 'table is great on all accounts, but it didn't include a headshell, or cart.

    I've aligned a cart - or two - in my day, but I hate the process. IGD and sibilance drive me nuts; I just don't trust myself with the alignment process.

    So, of course, my attention turned to the Ortofon Concorde series. As these carts are designed specifically for the 1200, it's a convenience that is hard to resist. It looks as though Ortofon released some new Concorde models just this year: Ortofon DJ Cartridges, Ortofon Concorde, Concorde cartridges, Ortofon OM, OM cartridges . The marketing is a little cheesy, but if it sounds good, it sounds good.

    Seems to me that the model most suited to the hi-fi world is the Concorde MKII Club: Concorde MkII CLUB

    Has anyone heard it?

    My other thought is to try one of KABs ProS Cartridge w/STY30 Stylus, but it's probably about double to price. I'm not totally familiar with the Concorde history, but I guess this is KABs attempt to put the 10, 20, 30, and 40 styli on a Concorde body.

    I know this has been discussed a bit around here, but I suppose the unique angle of this thread ought to be focused only on Concorde bodies, experiences and opinions. I'd also like to know if anyone has heard any of the Ortofon Concorde carts that have recently been released.

    Thanks!
     
  2. patient_ot

    patient_ot Senior Member

    Location:
    USA
    Any elliptical for a DJ isn't an elliptical like we know hi-fi/home listening carts to be. It's going to be much fatter and mounted on a fat, strong cantilever so it can take abuse.

    Converting those dimensions listed on that site would show a .5 x .10 mil elliptical. That's not going to be that much different than a fat .6 or .7 conical stylus. If you are sensitive to IGD, you WILL hear it on a cart like that. I would skip this cart entirely if you are trying to set up the turntable for home listening/hi-fi use.
     
    gss likes this.
  3. Dubmart

    Dubmart Senior Member

    Location:
    Bristol, England
    Concordes work well on 1200/10s and you can always swap out the DJ stylus for an OM 10, OM 20 or better, I did see a brochure for all the new Concordes in a local shop, but I have no idea what they are like compared to the older versions. Another option would be to get one of the 2Ms in the fitted headshell, more expensive, but probably better sound, especially if you can stretch to the Bronze which I have tried on a 1210 and it was very impressive, although that was through a very good phono stage.
     
  4. patient_ot

    patient_ot Senior Member

    Location:
    USA
    If you can't align a cart yourself, take it to a shop and have them do it for you. If you can't go to a local shop, buy a cart from someone that will put it on a decent headshell and use calipers to align it to the Technics standard.
     
  5. gss

    gss Forum Resident Thread Starter

    Location:
    New Jersey
    I do have someone who can help me who is excellent at cart alignment, but I feel like the Concorde is specifically engineered for the Technics 1200, so it might be better that a human set-up. That's my imagination, anyway.
     
    Shak Cohen likes this.
  6. patient_ot

    patient_ot Senior Member

    Location:
    USA
    If you are fixated on the Concorde, I'd get one from KAB and call it a day. I wouldn't mess with any other Concorde. Doesn't matter how tailored it is for the Technics, a fat DJ stylus will have IGD no matter what you do.

    FWIW in terms of tailoring all they probably did was build the cart with Technics 52mm overhang. You can do the same thing with a conventional cart on a headshell and a pair of calipers. I would rec a Technics overhang gauge, but too many of them are warped and therefore useless (got one like that recently).
     
    Dubmart likes this.
  7. Dubmart

    Dubmart Senior Member

    Location:
    Bristol, England
    As I said the Concordes work great with Technics, but almost all of them come with spherical tips, they are marketed for DJs who back cue, most decent hi fi carts have more advanced stylus profiles, so you will want to replace the stylus which means the cheapest Concorde body is likely your best bet and then get a good OM stylus, but buying a 2M in fitted headshell will give you all the advantages of a Concorde with a better cart and stylus, unless you plan on deejaying of course.

    I'm pretty sure the overhang on the fitted 2Ms is perfect for the Technics, I did try one on a 1210 and would imagine I checked that, but I can't be sure, it sounded like it was spot on though.
     
    ultron9 and patient_ot like this.
  8. Chris Schoen

    Chris Schoen Rock 'n Roll !!!

    Location:
    Maryland, U.S.A.
    Ya, Concorde with an OM stylus is the way to go. Conical stylus is hard on records and lack detail.
     
    Shak Cohen likes this.
  9. gss

    gss Forum Resident Thread Starter

    Location:
    New Jersey
    Yup. Here it is at Turntable Lab. However, at that price, it would make sense to buy the cart, a headshell, and have my friend just align it thereby destroying my thoughts about a Concorde. I guess I didn't realize that these carts have a larger elliptical which get into conical territory.

    So, you're saying that the KAB version will also add unnecessary IGD, @patient_ot?
     
  10. gss

    gss Forum Resident Thread Starter

    Location:
    New Jersey
    BTW: I'm not deejaying, this is for home use.
     
  11. Dubmart

    Dubmart Senior Member

    Location:
    Bristol, England
    Ideally you need a cheap used Concorde body with no stylus, then get an OM 20 for example and you will have a great cart that is perfectly set up for plug and play, I actually have an OM fitted to my 1210, but as it has a Rega arm it's a standard OM body not a Concorde.
     
    Curiosity, andybeau and Shak Cohen like this.
  12. patient_ot

    patient_ot Senior Member

    Location:
    USA
    No, the new Ortofon whatever it's called that some hype marketing thing for DJ.

    If going through KAB, I would get the OM30 or OM40 stylus for the Concorde. Those are advanced stylus shapes and should be IGD eliminators on most records. I wouldn't bother with any of the OM ellipticals.
     
  13. ShallowMemory

    ShallowMemory Classical Princess

    Location:
    GB
    The origins of the Concorde were Hifi but it got co-opted to DJ usage so is usually supplied with styli more suited to the requirements of DJing such as being able to scratch and back cue rather than domestic Hifi. Dubmart is on the money when he suggested a Concorde body that may be used and a new styli which is what I use actually for vinyl in my Marantz deck with an S shape arm.
     
  14. daytona600

    daytona600 Forum Resident

    Location:
    UK
    technics use these at shows 2M PNP " plug & play "[​IMG] [​IMG]
     
    caracallac and gss like this.
  15. gss

    gss Forum Resident Thread Starter

    Location:
    New Jersey
    If one can just buy - say a Pro S Concorde body for $100.00 - and replace the stylus with a 30 or 40, then what is unique about the KAB version?
     
    Heckto35 likes this.
  16. Nephrodoc

    Nephrodoc Forum Resident

    I thing special about the KAB version, you could make your own if you wanted. It have the PROS30, it was $300 if memory serves.
     
  17. brandonh

    brandonh Forum Resident

    I realize it's an old thread.
    As an FYI Ortofon has released an integrated for hifi I have it and love it, on my Technics SL-1210M5G.
    The Concorde Century

    I purchased mine from
    Ortofon's Concorde Century MM Cartridge
     
    JackG likes this.
  18. DoF

    DoF Less is more...

    Location:
    Poland
  19. DaleClark

    DaleClark Forum Resident

    Location:
    Columbus, Ohio
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

molar-endocrine