DCC Archive Ampex Multitrack EQ Question

Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by lukpac, Dec 20, 2001.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. lukpac

    lukpac Senior Member Thread Starter

    Location:
    Milwaukee, WI
    A buddy of mine asked wrote this, and Steve suggested I post it here. So I am. FWIW, he was talking to Talmy about the Who tapes.

     
  2. Steve Hoffman

    Steve Hoffman Your host Your Host

    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Luke,

    Regarding the stereo mixes on Who's Missing:

    As I remember, the stereo mixes were actually kind of midrangy, and I did this type of EQ to them:

    -2 @ 3000 cycles, +2 @ 10,0000 cycles, +2 @ 50 cycles.

    Of course, these were mixed by someone other than Talmy at IBC, since he doesn't recall that these exist.

    But, Talmy would never have used AME. No British producer or engineer would have. Talmy would have added console EQ instead.

    AME, or "Ampex Master Eq" curve was invented by some genius at Ampex to help reduce tape hiss. When you used it, it added (among other weird ****) +8db at 1000 to the recording. When you played it back, it SUBTRACTED 8db at 1000.

    Problem was, IF YOUR RECORDING LEVELS WENT INTO THE RED AT ALL, YOU HIT A WALL OF MIDRANGE DISTORTION THAT COULD KILL YOU, cause the thing just overloaded, and not in a nice way. Just listen to any RCA Living Stereo LP master AME tape recorded after 1959! Ouch!

    So, engineers who liked to use tape saturation for compression would never use AME.

    Talmy (and most British folks back then) liked to push the meters at levels of +12 to saturate the tape!!!! Even today, the "0" set up tone on an analog tape machine is only +3. That is 3 db above the old "0 vu" setting established back in 1954.

    So, as you can imagine, recording at +12 is darn hot, well into extreme saturation. This is the reason that Talmy says that there is no tape hiss on the three tracks. The music was recorded so loud on the tape, that the hiss (way down there at -20 db) is not there.

    If he tried that with AME, WHAM! They would have runs screaming.

    I have an Ampex four track machine that has AME on it (if selected). It cost extra in the old days, but some engineers used it a little bit; ("Ring A Ding" LP by Sinatra was recorded AME).

    I've never run across a British tape that ever did, though. Only CCIR (British EQ) or good old NAB (National Association of Broadcasters).

    Most of the British rock tapes that I have worked with are +12 NAB (The Cars, Who's Next, Rod Stewart "Never A Dull Moment", Fresh Cream, etc.)

    Oh, and the CORRECT AME EQ has not much to do with the top end, just the midrange.

    This help?
     
  3. lukpac

    lukpac Senior Member Thread Starter

    Location:
    Milwaukee, WI
    That's probably why the stuff you mastered (WM LP/CD, TM LP) sounds better than the stuff you didn't (TM CD) - the TM CD doesn't have the fullness that your stuff does.

    Well, who knows. That was a long time ago. Memories fade. For all we know he *did* do those mixes and just doesn't remember it.
     
  4. John Oteri

    John Oteri New Member In Memoriam

    Location:
    Hollywood, CA
    Please forgive a possibly stupid question from a newbe:

    Where does the RIAA Curve fit in to all of this?

    Thank you Steve.
     
  5. Steve Hoffman

    Steve Hoffman Your host Your Host

    Location:
    Los Angeles
    John,

    Welcome. The RIAA EQ curve has to do with phonograph records only.

    Simply stated, the Recording Industry curve, which was standardized in 1954-55, means the following:

    When a record is cut, the treble control is turned all the way up, and the bass control is turned all the way down, so the lacquer sounds pretty funky. But, it does two important things for the recording:

    The bass is mostly removed, so the groove can be smaller. Bass information takes up so much space on a record, that without the bass cut, the side of an LP would be under five minutes, max.

    The treble boost, helps to eliminate surface noise.

    How?

    Here's how: When the record is PLAYED BACK on your stereo, your Phono preamp has an RIAA decoder in it that adds the exact amount of bass back, and decreases the treble by the right amount, thereby taking the surface noise way down with it. You see?

    Kind of a early Dolby type deal.

    So, it's crucial that YOUR phono preamp has the correct RIAA curve in it. Most tube phono stages are off a little, and most moving coil carts vary from neutral as well.

    That's it. The RIAA curve is still being used Worldwide when Phonograph records are cut, making the almost 50 year old stardard something of a survivor. A well cut LP when played back correctly can still sound amazing and lifelike; a true "analog" of a sound wave.

    John, no question is stupid. Ask whatever you want!
     
  6. RetroSmith

    RetroSmith Forum Hall Of Fame<br>(Formerly Mikey5967)

    Location:
    East Coast
    Steve.....do you recall a 10 track recorder introduced around 1967?

    There is a studio in Minnesota that has (they believe) the last working unit.
    The transport is a Viking unit, the electronics have no name on them. It was solid state.

    It mounts sideways in a standard 21 inch rack...and it looks REALLY cool!!

    Ever heard of it, or do you think that was a custom thing?

    Mikey
     
  7. Steve Hoffman

    Steve Hoffman Your host Your Host

    Location:
    Los Angeles
    I've heard of a "twelve track" that belonged to Mustang Records...Wasn't "Talk Talk" by the Music Machine recorded on it, along with the Bobby Fuller Four stuff?

    Never actually seen one, or a 10-track for that matter.

    Others have though, I'm sure..
     
  8. lukpac

    lukpac Senior Member Thread Starter

    Location:
    Milwaukee, WI
    The Record Plant had a 12-track machine. That's what much of Electric Ladyland was done on. I seem to remember reading that Eddie Kramer thought it kind of sucked, and was very happy to move to 16-track shortly after that.

    Just as Abbey Road was going to 8-track... :D
     
  9. Steve Hoffman

    Steve Hoffman Your host Your Host

    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Well,

    In order to get 12 tracks on 1 inch tape, compromises have to be made in sound quality.

    That is why recording engineers who cared about sound quality hated the 2" 24 track machines that replaced the amazing sounding 2" 16 track decks of the 1970's.

    Adding 8 more tracks in without changing tape width ain't any way to run an airline, if you ask me.
     
  10. lukpac

    lukpac Senior Member Thread Starter

    Location:
    Milwaukee, WI
    I don't believe that was the issue with Kramer. Or, at least I haven't seen him mention it. It was stuff like noisy punch-ins and such.
     
  11. Angel

    Angel New Member

    Location:
    Hollywood, Ca.
    Great thread!

    Couldn't get this kind of information anywhere else on the net.

    Thanks, Luke, Steve et al!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

molar-endocrine