Anybody like The Kinks?

Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by Metoo, Apr 8, 2005.

  1. ChristianL

    ChristianL Well-Known Member

    Location:
    Berlin, Germany
    Yeah, especially his singing :laugh:
     
  2. I like the Kinks together with The Beatles and the Zombies.
    These three are my Top 3 British Invasion bands.

    My top three favourite Kink's songs are:

    1) Tired Of Waiting For You
    2) Well Respected Man
    3) Waterloo Sunset
     
  3. Andreas

    Andreas Forum Resident

    Location:
    Frankfurt, Germany
    His singing career in my country lasted from about 1989 to about 1991. Baywatch is still going strong on the reruns, though.
     
  4. Joel1963

    Joel1963 Well-Known Member

    Location:
    Montreal
    I'm having that problem with older movies myself.
    :(
     
  5. grbl

    grbl Just Lurking

    Location:
    new york
    Very true.
     
  6. proufo

    proufo Active Member

    Location:
    Bogotá, Colombia
    From a recent post in Neil Ottenstein's Kinks mailing list. This is reportedly from Shel Talmy:

    Okay, recording the band. "You Really Got Me" was done in mono because
    the head of Pye at that time was a complete non-music man/major jerk named
    Louie Benjamin who insisted on charging me for the studio costs and so as
    I was very inexperienced at getting a 'reasonable' contract and on the
    hook for the costs, did it the least expensive way, mono. Naturally,
    after it became a huge hit, the moron was told by his (very intimidated)
    staff that the 'new' thing was to do a stereo recording and so he
    'relented' and started picking up the recording costs so I could do
    stereo.

    So from then on I recorded in 3 and 4-track at Pye #2 studio, the smaller
    band studio.

    I guess I should also mention that it never took a lot of time to record
    because as I'm sure everybody now knows, at that time the longer a band
    took to record, the less they were regarded, as only 'bad' bands took
    ages.

    I'd love to remix and re-master the stuff I did but I don't think the
    tapes are available any more. Pye was the most disorganized label I've
    ever dealt with and I've heard from several sources that the tapes
    'disappeared', and any re-releases are from 3rd and 4th generation tapes,
    and not the multi-tracks.

    Cheers,

    Shel
     
  7. Jay

    Jay New Member

    Location:
    Pittsburgh PA
    Proufo: How do I join this mailing list?

    Thanks, Jay
     
  8. sharedon

    sharedon Forum Zonophone

  9. proufo

    proufo Active Member

    Location:
    Bogotá, Colombia
    Two additional messages from (reportedly) Shel Talmy.

    Re your recent messages about who did what on "You Really Got
    Me", Jimmy page and related subjects, wild speculation etc.

    As I produced You Really Got Me, and the next few years worth of
    Kinks, I can tell you absolutely that Page did not do the solo,
    Dave did, that Bobbie Graham played drums on that single and the
    first LP, where I used Page as a rhythm guitarist along with John
    Lord on organ and Perry Ford on piano.

    Now i obviously don't expect these "revelations" to stop all the
    various people writing in, who absolutely know "the real truth".
    After all, what do I know apart from being there, being the
    producer and hiring the musicians and studio...But what the hell,
    it's worth a try.

    And:

    I really hate to ruin anybody's fun/life, but Dave played ALL the
    solos on all the Kinks records I produced, where there was a
    guitar solo.


    In answer to Joe Brennan as who got paid for sessions, I found
    the Kinks through their manager Robert Wace, then the Ravens,
    and brought them into Pye. My first mistake in my very young,
    very naive days, was to have Pye sign them instead of me. Oh
    well, we all make mistakes and I made a bunch.

    The president of Pye at that time was a bastard named Louis
    Benjamin, who as the expression goes, treated nickels like
    manhole covers, and in the spirit of that philosophy, charged me
    for session costs, deducted before I received my royalties.

    At that time, the practice was not to pay the members of the band
    for playing on their own sessions. I was not privvy to what the
    Kinks management worked out with Pye for advances or payments, so
    can't really comment, but the musicians I hired got the going
    union rate which was around 7 pounds, 10 shillings for a 3 hour
    session, and that was part of the budget I was being charged for
    and paid in front by Pye.

    Because of this Drakonian policy on Benjamin's behalf, I decided
    that the first couple of records were recorded mono, as that was
    cheaper than multi-track, and I really couldn't afford to be
    charged for more money at that time, as my expenses were high and
    my royalties coming sometime in the future.

    After damn near everybody told that jerk Benjamin that stereo was
    necessary, it finally dawned on him that he'd have to rework
    charging me if he wanted multi-track, and eventually that
    happened. Now I know I'm rambling but will try to get to the
    point.

    Session guys were paid in cash then by a "fixer". The one we all
    used then was a man named Charlie Katz, who would come around
    sometime during the session to pay the guys. If anybody has
    records of the transactions, I would imagine Katz has them,
    assuming he's still around. Pye was amazingly disorganized then
    and got worse. I can tell you that when Rhino was going to
    release the Kinks packages they never found first generation
    master tapes, because Pye had lost them, or flushed them down the
    toilet or whatever.

    Does this clear anything up, or obfuscate it even more? I
    suppose I will learn that from the next batch of mail.
     
  10. galactustrilogy

    galactustrilogy New Member

    Location:
    sunnyvale, calif
    Can anyone tell me the name of the CD that has "Victoria" on it (a CD that isn't one of their greatest hit compilations) ?
     
  11. pdenny

    pdenny It's only an album

    Location:
    Ask the NSA, narc
    ARTHUR...a must-own album if there ever was one. A pinnacle of Ray's art. Go get it, now!
     
  12. peterC

    peterC Aussie Addict

    Location:
    sydney
    Can't argue with that!
     
  13. howeyes

    howeyes Member

    Location:
    Los Angeles
    When I was in my senior year in my high school, I had a physics teacher that conducted an experiment using Schoolboys in Disgrace. For one hour our class borrowed the band room and we listened to Schoolboys in its entirety. I remember how much the lyrics had a profound effect on me during that time.

    Listen to lyrics and remember your school days. If you a child or know of someone in high school play them the cd and ask them to pay close attention to Ray's lyrics. I sure did that one afternoon long time ago when my physics teacher played Schoolboys in Disgrace.
     
  14. pdenny

    pdenny It's only an album

    Location:
    Ask the NSA, narc
    Hey Jack, did you wiggle your backside and start studying? ;) :laugh:
     
  15. Barry Wom

    Barry Wom New Member

    Location:
    Pepperland

    every time I see that avatar of Grace Kelly my heart misses a beat - my all time favourite woman.

    Tim
     
  16. proufo

    proufo Active Member

    Location:
    Bogotá, Colombia
    Anothet interesting posting from the Kinks' mailing list. This is from one Russel Smith. While he destroys his credibility by indicating the Ray was involved, he seems, at least, to care.

    1998

    I have now been involved with the Castle re-issues of the Kinks Pye
    recordings on and off for some considerable time (more on, than off,of
    late) So quite obviously I've been interested in the varied reaction,
    from all quarters to the re-issues. However, I suppose the most
    important feeback, I believe is the opinions of the fans. So therefore I
    have read the digest over the last few months with great interest,
    sometimes with faint amusement, sometimes with amazement, but allways
    with a sense that all opinions are valid (I guess every ones got there
    own ideas what should and should'nt be included on these re-issues)

    To be absolutely honest, it was never my intention to reveal the
    reasoning of why the re-issues ended up the way they did. Hopefully the
    re-issues would peak for themselves. However, various circumstances
    changed my view on remaining silent. Because these re-issues are a
    combination of various peoples efforts not just mine alone. What is set
    out below is just my own view of how "it all panned out"

    Before I start in earnest, a few points must be made clear and a few
    misconceptions laid to rest, namely:

    Ray Davies had full and absolute artistic control of the project,
    something that cannot be said of previous "releases" of the Pye back
    catalogue.

    The Pye/Castle archive is NOT chocked full of long lost gems and
    unreleased lost albums!! In fact the cupboard is remarkable bare, so to
    speak.Pye records was a very frugal company particulary during the
    period the Kinks were signed to the label. Once the production/cutting
    masters for any particular recording was deemed complete, the session
    multi-track tapes in most cases were wiped ready for re-use.
    Unfortunately to compound this loss what Kinks multi-tracks did survive
    appear to have been destroyed when Pye's Mitcham wharehouse went up in
    flames. I'm also lead to believe before the fire desroyed these tapes,
    they where not particulary well looked after, so had the survived it is
    likely possible that some of the tapes may not have been in a useable
    condition anyway.

    Literally what survives on multi-track today is an absolute handful of
    recordings. The vast majority of the tracks for this re-issue programme
    were remastered from the original 1/4" production/cutting masters. The
    only tracks sourced from multi-track where Mr. Reporter;Little
    Women;Lazy old Sun and Mr Shoemakers Daughter.

    I would further point out that the vast majority of the
    alternate/unreleased tracks did not originate from from the Pye/Castle
    archive, In fact they were liberated from a number of disperate sources
    from around the world.

    I can assure everyone, every avenue was explored as thoroughly as time
    permitted, every track available was looked at for possible inclusion.

    The reason why the first 7 albums feature the mono mix, is quite
    simple. That is the way that Ray and the Band meant them to be heard.
    Most of the stereo mixes from this period, where carried out by the
    in-house engineers, sometimes with scant regard for the bands wishes (it
    is maybe possible that the band where not even present at these mixing
    sessions). The only probable exception may have been the Village Green
    album and subsequent recordings where more care has been paid to the
    stereo mix.

    It's just in the rush to stereo in the'70's record companies
    (presumptously) on our behalf believed "we" wanted to hear the stereo
    recordings!! So it is these recordings "we" have become 'au-fait' with
    over the years.

    These re-issues have not been thrown together as some have suggested. A
    lot of care and thought have been put into them one way or another.
    However, the overiding factor in each case has been put into preserving
    the integrity of the original album. Also time was taken out to track
    down and speak to the original engineers and various other staff
    involved in recording the band during the Pye contract.

    One should also not lose sight this is primarily a album re-issue
    programme. It was never a fore gone conclusion that every single and
    B-side be included,although it would be nice to do so, tracks would not
    included at the expense of the integrity of the the original album. Also
    preference was given were possible to including different material
    rather than retread ground trodden by the 101 previous other
    compilations.

    ________________________________________________________________________

    I'll quickly run through some specific points that I've seen raised

    The first five re-issues

    The last second omission of some of the bonus tracks on these CD's was
    really a sound quality issue, what sounds fine on a isolated reference
    CD-R is a different matter when placed on a production CD . There is a
    sound quality threshold that really as far as the Kinks are concerned,
    that can't be breached. Every one including me would love to see more
    unreleased rercordings, but this shoul'nt be at the expense that
    compromises the integrity of the the original album.

    _______________________________________________________________________

    Kelvin Hall

    Comparison with the Who live at Leeds is grossly unfair,quite
    co-incedently I work with a chap who claims he was at the show the Who
    recorded at Leeds University in Feb 1970, I have no reason to disbelieve
    him, as we both live in the Leeds area (He is also my boss!) He
    recollects the Who playing for the thick end of three hours that night!
    Conversely if you were to add the running time of the the TWO shows the
    Kinks played back then on April 1st 1967 at the Kelvin Hall, it would
    been just lasted over the hour.

    I'm believe I'm right in saying the only track not included on the
    original album that the band played that night was Beautiful Delilah.

    So the original album, was near enough what you would have got had you
    attended a Kinks show back then.

    Efforts were made to track down other live recordings of the period
    notably:

    Paris O'lympia show from April 23rd 1967 (Thought to have been a back up
    recording for Kelvin Hall) It now appears doubtful this show was ever
    recorded.

    Show two from Kelvin Hall (As previously mentioned the band played two
    shows that night)

    The original undubbed masters

    None of the above were found, Although they might have been of interest.
    However, if they had been found it is unlikely that they would have
    revealed anything new about the Kinks live circa 1967.

    ________________________________________________________________________

    The Village green Preservation Society

    Thoughts were intially to make this a 2CD set, this was the case well
    into production of the first five re-issues, then for a variety of
    reasons it was reduced to a single CD. Had the 2CD set option been taken
    no doubt various demo's,outakes and all of the associated 45's from the
    period would have wound up on the bonus disc.
    When the decision to go with only a single disc was made, it was to late
    to return tracks like "She's got everything" to there rightful place
    (Kink Kontroversy) The two 'missing' Dave 45's should end up on Dave's
    European Anthology,in due course.

    In my opinion how do you treat one of the most influential albums in the
    Kinks canon? To have the original album followed by demo's and half
    finished tracks did'nt seem appropriate, as did including the various
    singles of the period (Days excepted) the musical compatability would'nt
    have been there. It just seemed logical to include the stereo 12 track
    album.

    Even though the mono album was likely as not the band preffered edition,
    it's distribution was limited, only ever getting a release in the UK,
    where the conversion to stereo was quickly gathering pace at the time.
    With the consequence that the mono version was promptly lost never to
    been seen again until now (testiment to this is the price the original
    mono copies are now fetching on the collectors market) The mono mix is
    distinctly different from the more well known stereo mix this
    counterpoints nicely with the alternate mixes, different track/running
    order of the 12 track edition of the album. I'm sure most people will
    find something new and different in this re-issue,particulary our
    overseas friends were the mono edition was never released in the first
    place. Also the running time pretty much uses up the time available on a
    single CD, giving excellant value for money.

    _______________________________________________________________________

    Arthur

    The reason the mono single mix of Shangri-la was omitted was that this
    particular track exhibits some truely awful distortion towards the end
    of the song (If you have the original 45, it can be heard distinctly)
    the remastering process only amplified the distortion, also for once
    there was a surfit of bonus material, more than could be fitted on a
    single CD, so it was decided to drop this track (Incidentley also
    omitted at the eleventh hour was a alternate mono mix of Australia) in
    favour of the wonderful stereo mixes of Plastic Man and the two Dave B
    sides.

    Lastly lets put to bed the mystic about Daves Hold my Hand demo, the
    sound quality is "Bloody awful" and no amount of remastering could
    restore it to a useable level, bearing in mind it would have to be
    remastered from vinyl in the first place!!!

    ________________________________________________________________________

    Kinks part one:

    Contary to popular belief there is not endless amount of unused tracks
    for this album, obviously there are some, but in general pretty much
    what was recorded was used. The reason for the non inclusion of the Lola
    B side Berkeley Mews, was like She's got everything was not included on
    the VGPS. It was not musically in sympathy with the rest of the
    album.Berekeley Mews was in fact recorded circa the VGPS sessions, once
    again had the VGPS ended up as a 2CD set, it may have well ended up on
    the bonus disc.

    The master for the mono single mix Apeman has been lost, despite a
    exhuastive search including checking all the stereo masters in case it
    had been misfiled,However, the search proved fruitless, it could not be
    found. So the reason for it's omission is simple it no longer exists as
    a master (so hang on to your old blue Pye 45!)

    There was also some intial thoughts of trying to add some live tracks
    from the period to extend the bonus selection of this album, but none of
    sufficient quality were to be found.

    ________________________________________________________________________

    Percy

    The intention with Percy from the outset was to make it far more
    expansive, Castle went to a lot of trouble and expense to liberate the
    actual film soundtrack recordings, unfortunatley the vast majority of
    these particular recordings were riddled with distortions of some
    description or had unaceptable shifts in levels,and even more
    frustratingly the tapes where of a format that was very difficult to
    rectify these shortcomings, despite the best endeavours of the remaster
    engineers to weave thier magic, they could not rectify
    these shortcomings(Incidentley I believe the remaster engineers on the
    whole have done an exceptional job with the re-issue programme)

    The bonus's you have on this CD are what tracks the engineers managed to
    salvage
    _______________________________________________________________________

    So there you have it

    The barrel has well and truely been scraped, as far as the Pye
    recordings go, of course there is still the odd track still left, mainly
    those which came to light to late in the day to be included on these
    re-issues,no doubt a handful of more unreleased tracks will come to
    light in the years to come. But in my opinion nearly all the unreleased
    recordings of any worth(in decent quality) are now out. I must admit I
    do find it somewhat frustrating when various song titles are banded
    around, "they should have included that, they should have
    included this" but believe me when I say every track that could be got
    hold of was looked at and considered, and if its not included there is
    reason for it not being there. (mainly a sound quality reason!)

    The re-issues have now taken these CD's out of the bargin bin so to
    speak and hopefully put some prestiege back into to these classic albums
    (this has been lacking for to long in my opinion) The packaging
    and content compares extremely well indeed with other re-issues,all at
    mid price too! (remember the Who re-issues sold at full price intially)
    Also I have just seen the new Pretty Things re-issues, although
    excellant I believe they do not show the attention to detail these Kinks
    re-issues do.

    So my advice is to sit back switch on your Hi Fi and ENJOY!

    Russell Smith
     
  17. Jay

    Jay New Member

    Location:
    Pittsburgh PA
    Pablo - Thanks very much for these last few postings. This is a whole lot more than I ever knew about the Pye recordings.
     
  18. Andreas

    Andreas Forum Resident

    Location:
    Frankfurt, Germany
    That is sad. Not even the 1985 Greatest Hits CD used the mono mix.
     
  19. Mike Dow

    Mike Dow I kind of like the music

    Location:
    Bangor, Maine
    Pablo-
    Thank you for posting this info. Lots to read there. While most of the Castle 98 releases have some very wonky EQ choices (a nearly complete lack of bass and jacked up high end)
    I listened to "Arthur" yesterday and was reminded that this is one reissue that they nearly "got right". While still slightly bass-shy, they seem to have spent more time with this one. The music, of course, is exemplary.
     
  20. Andreas

    Andreas Forum Resident

    Location:
    Frankfurt, Germany
    I think this has more to do with the fact that Arthur was recorded and mixed much better than the previous albums.

    I prefer the PRT CD. No noise reduction, more dynamics.
     
  21. Mike Dow

    Mike Dow I kind of like the music

    Location:
    Bangor, Maine
    I listened carefully to the '98 Castle reissue of Arthur and could detect no use of noise reduction. Are you sure this one has it? I'm familiar with the recording history of The Kinks 60's material and understand the differences in recording technique on this album. My initial post was a comment on just the mastering of the disc compared with some of the other '98 reissues (which IMO are an abomination).
     
  22. Adam9

    Adam9 Formerly jbohdan

    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    Except for the mess they made on the stereo "This Man He Weeps Tonight". It is supposedly fixed on the reissue of the Castle 98 but id doesn't sit too well with me to have to buy another copy of this CD so I can have a decent stereo version of this song on CD :realmad: .
     
  23. Chris M

    Chris M Forum Resident

    Location:
    Baton Rouge, LA

    For a band that ceased recording 35 years ago The Beatles are EXTREMELY popular among young people. Trust me. Most music fans in their 20's and 30's get it. We aren't quite as culturally bankrupt as some of you older guys would like to believe ;)
     
  24. peterC

    peterC Aussie Addict

    Location:
    sydney
    No need to rebuy the 1998 Castle. Get the stereo version in excellent sound quality off ebay on The Great Lost Kinks Album boot and you'll get lots of other goodies with it!
     
  25. Mike Dow

    Mike Dow I kind of like the music

    Location:
    Bangor, Maine
    When listening again this week, I was reminded of the awful stereo mix of "This Man He...".You can almost hear a bass playing (or are those the bass strings of Dave's guitar?) but you can 't feel it. And the percussion? Just some tambourine being tapped in the background. So this mix was corrected on a later pressing? I'm glad they fixed it but it irks me too that I have to buy the disc again to get it.
     

Share This Page