Can the Bob Dylan 1965-1966 LP Trilogy Be Topped?*

Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by Jerryb, Sep 1, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Tonmeister

    Tonmeister Forum Resident

    Location:
    New York
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Moshe likes this.
  2. Moshe

    Moshe "Silent in four languages."

    Location:
    U.S.
    I always thought of these as more of a correct trilogy then the so called "Berlin" trilogy.
    Lodger goes better with Scary Monsters. IMO
     
  3. Tonmeister

    Tonmeister Forum Resident

    Location:
    New York
  4. dachada

    dachada Senior Member

    Location:
    FL
  5. hello people

    hello people Forum Resident

    Location:
    Earth
    Dylan? Dylan who??

    These minstrels have him covered 100 times over...I present to you the greatest trilogy of all time:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Check out Stay Hungry...look at him...he's gnawing on a huge bone in the corner of some concrete cell!
     
    Last edited: Sep 2, 2014
  6. BluesOvertookMe

    BluesOvertookMe Forum Resident

    Location:
    Houston, TX, USA
    Yes.
     
  7. crimpies

    crimpies Forum Resident

  8. Dr. Pepper

    Dr. Pepper What, me worry?

    Oh yeah!
     
    graystoke and JohnnyQuest like this.
  9. slayerhatesusall

    slayerhatesusall Well-Known Member

    [​IMG]

    Also a trilogy.
     
  10. scobb

    scobb Forum Resident

    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    Yes or no?
    Agree or disagree?
     
    pablorkcz likes this.
  11. Jason Manley

    Jason Manley Senior Member

    Location:
    O-H-I-O
    You have a point. I mean, ultimately what qualifies as a trilogy in art? I posted the mid-90's Guided by Voices albums because I feel that they act as something of a trilogy of the Indie Rock scene from that time. Many may view that differently.

    If it's just a theme or unique recording/release schedule I probably should have done the 3 (yes three) albums released by GBV in 2012: "Let's Go Eat the Factory", "Class Clown Spots a UFO" and "The Bears for Lunch".

    Are any of these better than Dylan? Obviously a very subjective question. Most would say no way, no how. I might...
     
  12. MaccaBeatles

    MaccaBeatles Forum Resident

    Location:
    Greater London
  13. HominyRhodes

    HominyRhodes Forum Resident

    Location:
    Chicago
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Zeki likes this.
  14. Zombeels

    Zombeels Forum Resident

    This is the winning combination

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    s m @ likes this.
  15. Zombeels

    Zombeels Forum Resident

    Another great 3 run.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    c-eling likes this.
  16. JohnnyQuest

    JohnnyQuest Forum Resident

    Location:
    Paradise
  17. erniebert

    erniebert Shoe-string audiophile

    Location:
    Toronto area
  18. erniebert

    erniebert Shoe-string audiophile

    Location:
    Toronto area
  19. erniebert

    erniebert Shoe-string audiophile

    Location:
    Toronto area
  20. JohnnyQuest

    JohnnyQuest Forum Resident

    Location:
    Paradise
  21. JohnnyQuest

    JohnnyQuest Forum Resident

    Location:
    Paradise
  22. wildstar

    wildstar Senior Member

    Location:
    ontario, canada
    I'd hardly think that the over two year gap between WN & Quad (especially in an era when many bands were still releasing at least one - and often two - albums per year) qualifies as "released right after", or the nearly two year gap between Tommy and WN either. Especially since they recorded nearly enough for an album during each of those gaps (and far more than enough for an album in the 1.5 year gap between Sell Out and Tommy), which were rejected/abandoned (as albums), instead coming out in dribs and drabs over the decades as non-album singles (The Seeker, Join Together) compilations (Odds & Sods, Who's & Two's Missing) and CD bonuses (Who Sell Out Expanded)

    For a while there, no concept meant no album.

    A better trilogy (one without gaping holes in the timeline) would be Tommy (1969), Live At Leeds (1970) and Who's Next (1971).

    Certainly rather than something like:

    Who Sell Out (1967)

    Unreleased/abandoned Who's For Tennis (working title?) album (1968)

    Tommy (1969)

    Unreleased (live on stage, during this period, many new songs played, were announced as coming "from our soon to be released new studio album" which wasnt) (1970)

    Who's Next (1971)

    Unreleased/abandoned Rock Is Dead, Long Live Rock concept album, a couple songs of which were used on Quadrophenia (1972)

    Quadrophenia (1973)

    Odds & Sods - compilation album of rejects culled mostly from the three eras mentioned above. (1974)
     
    footlooseman likes this.
  23. Mylene

    Mylene Senior Member

    T. Rex
    Electric Warrior
    The Slider
     
    Mal likes this.
  24. cwitt1980

    cwitt1980 Senior Member

    Location:
    Carbondale, IL USA
    Some of my personal favorite trilogies.

    An obvious one is The Beatles: Rubber Soul, Revolver, Pepper
    The Kinks: Something Else, Village Green, Arthur
    Badfinger: Magic Christian Music, No Dice, Straight Up
    The Who's 1st 3 albums (in my opinion)
    The Mothers of Invention: Freak Out, Absolutely Free, We're Only In It For the Money
    Nazz, Nazz Nazz, Nazz III
    Tom Petty & the Heartbreakers Jimmy Iovine produced lp's: Damn the Torpedos, Hard Promises, Long After Dark
    The Byrds: 5D, Younger Than Yesterday, Notorious
    Nilsson: Pandemonium Shadow Show, Aerial Ballet, Harry
    Broadcast: The Noise People Make, Haha Sound, Tender Buttons

    Not sure if they all indeed 'top' Dylan (with exception the Beatles). In my book, the Kinks top 'em all.
     
  25. Mylene

    Mylene Senior Member

    Chelsea Girl
    The Marble Index
    Desertshore
     
    Moshe likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

molar-endocrine