Cassette better than CD

Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by Lashing, May 23, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Lashing

    Lashing Well-Known Member Thread Starter

    People will blast me for this again but I am listening to Dream Theater Images and Words right now. Original cassette copy sounds way better than my CD copy. WAY BETTER. Full range and great imaging. The CD sounds boxed in.

    I have nice gear including the Cassette deck which is Nakamichi RX505

    I don't know how this album was originally recorded but I find it odd my cassette sounds so much bigger and better than the CD. The decline of CD sales is the labels own fault as they always seem to compress the hell out of them.

    I am getting a ton more low end, much smoother highs .. and no the highs are not rolled off. Its just a sweeter, fuller natural sound vs the cheap nasty compressed CD sound.
     
  2. dino77

    dino77 Forum Resident

    Location:
    Europe
    Nope.
     
  3. FunkyNut

    FunkyNut Forum Resident

    Location:
    Chicagoland
    Billy Squier - Emotions In Motion. CD sucks.
     
  4. Prophetzong

    Prophetzong Forum Resident

    Location:
    NE WISC
    Pre-recorded cassettes were garbage for the most part. I don't miss them one bit. Good riddance to the cassette. I wish I would have spent all my money on vinyl or cd vs cassettes back in the day.
     
  5. jgkojak

    jgkojak Mull of Kansas

    Location:
    Lawrence, KS
    I am not very familiar with the music you're talking about -

    it could be if it was recorded in the mid 80s or so, that the original recording was analog and the cassette was produced in straight analog, and they did a poor job transferring it to CD -

    But its MORE likely that the way you prefer to hear music emphasizes some of the things cassettes tend to do (exaggerate high end, roll of low frequencies) - which means you may if you tested your hearing find out you had some hearing deficiencies in certain frequencies.
     
  6. GreatKingRat

    GreatKingRat Well-Known Member

    Location:
    England
    It's a cassette - of course the highs are rolled off... nothing over 16khz and tape hiss. It'd be even funnier if it's the same master as the CD, but dumped on a really lossy format. It probably no longer plays at the correct speed either.
     
    Anton888, mando_dan, Malina and 2 others like this.
  7. Prophetzong

    Prophetzong Forum Resident

    Location:
    NE WISC
    Yup, if your referring to that album,musically.

    I had the cassette of " Don't Say No". That wore out quickly. Have the cd. That is still in my collection . As well as The vinyl Lp of " Tale of the Tape".
     
  8. agaraffa

    agaraffa Senior Member

    There's no absolutes in life, I'm sure you can find an isolated incidence or two where an inferior medium can sound better than a superior one. As a general rule though, the vast majority of the time a CD will sound considerably better than a cassette.
     
  9. jgkojak

    jgkojak Mull of Kansas

    Location:
    Lawrence, KS
    I believe its possible that I could buy the highest quality cassette made, play an album on vinyl and record a cassette version at the right volume, etc and have something that, when played on a high end cassette player, could rival a badly done commercial CD. But not a commercial cassette.
     
    robertawillisjr likes this.
  10. Schoolmaster Bones

    Schoolmaster Bones Poe's Lawyer

    Location:
    ‎The Midwest
    Well that settles it.
     
    Billy Infinity, WPLJ, JimC and 2 others like this.
  11. KeithH

    KeithH Success With Honor...then and now

    Location:
    Beaver Stadium
    Are we talking about inherent quality of these formats or the mastering on one format being better than the mastering on another format? If the claim is that cassette is inherently better than CD, I don't agree.
     
    RomanZ, Aris, Nostaljack and 2 others like this.
  12. xcqn

    xcqn Audiophile

    Location:
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    Casettes are AAA, gotta have that :D
     
    flac, ssmith3046 and AudiophilePhil like this.
  13. ModernDayWarrior

    ModernDayWarrior Senior Member

    Was it a DigiLog cassette ;)
     
    Daniel Thomas and telepicker97 like this.
  14. Stryking

    Stryking Member

    I honestly find that pretty hard to believe... Guess it will be difficult for me to come to a conclusion since I don't have the cassette to listen to :p
     
  15. sons of nothing

    sons of nothing Forum Resident

    Location:
    Illinois
    Sure, and 78's are better than lps...
     
    Marc Bessette likes this.
  16. Mal

    Mal Phorum Physicist

    Yeah, Elcaset.

     
    Last edited: May 23, 2015
  17. theanalogkidsignals

    theanalogkidsignals Forum Resident

    Yeah, vinyl is best for that one. The original CD is bad. The BGO re-master isn't too terrible though.

    Extreme - II. It sounds so damn warm on cassette. The best sounding for sure. The vinyl is flat and missing a song, and the CD is cold. It's a DDD recording though, the tape probably just saturates it in a pleasant way. Usually anything is better than cassette, except 8-track.
     
  18. captone

    captone Forum Resident

    Location:
    BC, Canada
    Though I mostly bought vinyl, I also got quite a few pre-recorded cassettes in the 80s. There was a huge range in quality but with a nice cassette deck some sounded incredible. In the early 90's I made mixed tapes from CD's and would often prefer the sound of the cassette over the CD that it was recorded from (esp with tinny & thin sounding 80s CDs). I totally get why the OP prefers cassette to CD.
     
  19. Holy Diver

    Holy Diver Senior Member

    Location:
    USA
    Cassettes were great in my car back in the 80's. I think I will pass now, though.
     
    JimC, ARK and Nostaljack like this.
  20. RonW

    RonW Forum Resident

    Location:
    New York
    You're listening with a high end deck. You will have great sound just like you describe it. Cheap cassette players sound awful and were as far as most people looked. So forever they hate cassette.

    CDs are horribly compressed and flat sounding. You've got it right! Enjoy!
     
    Cronverc likes this.
  21. xcqn

    xcqn Audiophile

    Location:
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    Probably wandering of topic here but...

    Tape-saturation among other things analog is key to proper rock n' roll, just listen to the first two zeppelin albums, who's next and others from that era.

    Sometimes i wish we could just go back to pure AAA productions again. Analog just sounds so much more rock n' roll than modern digital productions. Digital is just too good/clean/perfect sounding. You need hiss, analog compressors and healthy dose of saturation to really get that gritty rock-sound!

    And for god sake don't use Pro-tools plugins trying to get that sound :D

    Slash gets it, just wish the albums were mastered better.
     
  22. Errr....no.

    But the OP can enjoy whatever he wants on that you correct.
     
    Nostaljack and shaboo like this.
  23. RonW

    RonW Forum Resident

    Location:
    New York
    Err - yes!
    I do like both formats and have cassettes here that sound way better than some of the CD trash out there. Just roll tape.

    And the OP is correct!
     
    Cronverc and Shak Cohen like this.
  24. Stryking

    Stryking Member

    What I'd be interested in is some old R2R stuff. I heard a rip of Led Zep 2 once and it sounded... different
     
  25. Dennis Metz

    Dennis Metz Born In A Motor City south of Detroit

    Location:
    Fonthill, Ontario
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

molar-endocrine