Digital Production vs Reel to Reel!?

Analog and digital in the professional realm are sooooo close that the differences are just about negligible.

A former SH member who is a Grammy-winning engineer once posted a bling comparison between the two because he couldn't decide on which mix to use. A lot of forumites got it wrong.

 

i hear that also that more spensive it gets more hard it is to hear the difference, like for example tubes and normal amps;

but that reel to reel no normal people can get, so maybe they should start to make very cheap reels to reels or make cassette again?

 

I was about to say that. But not only the DAT deck can eat a tape, a DAT tape can get its digital data corrupted over time (bad storing, temperature, moisture, cheap and bad tape formulation) and when playing one may get plenty of digital clicks.

 

If I was a recording engineer I'd track to analog and mix down to DSD 256, but that would be awfully expensive.

 

dsd well i had heard that amps use to clip if there is sound over 20khz and speakers can not produce so hight khz frequencies that DSD have + it goes a myth that even so hight frequencies can broke your speaker tweter