Dire Straits: Remastered CDs vs originals ?

Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by mhw58, Jan 19, 2008.

  1. autodidact

    autodidact Forum Resident

    I would agree with this. They're pretty good, but I would have been more pleased if there was no additional compression. I've gone back to the original W. German for Brothers In Arms. I've sold the original WB pressings I had except for Love Over Gold, so I can't really compare them.

    IMO, they're all enjoyable.
     
  2. acdc7369

    acdc7369 Forum Resident

    Location:
    United States
    Money for Nothing 2005 Mercury Remaster:
    mfn.jpg

    Yeah. One of the best remasters available. :rolleyes: LOL
     
  3. Ulli

    Ulli Forum Resident

    Location:
    Germany
    I believe most of us are thinking of the 1996 remasters. That version of Brothers In Arms has a DR value of 12, which isn't as good as the original CD, but far from horrendous.
     
    progrocker, dav-here and RoyalScam like this.
  4. eelkiller

    eelkiller One of the great unwashed

    Location:
    Northern Ontario
    It does not matter, we got a waveform in there. LOL.
     
  5. PH416156

    PH416156 Alea Iacta Est

    Location:
    Europe
    Hi!

    If you have EAC installed, you can compare it yourself:)

    Peak values for my unremastered German (not West) Vertigo:


    100.0 %/85.1 %/100.0 %/100.0 %/100.0 %


    P.S.

    Merry Xmas

    :cheers:
     
  6. You must be thinking of the 2005 SACD Hybrid of Brothers In Arms, which was a one off, and yes, not very good. When I think of the Dire Straits Remasters I am thinking of the 1996 remastering of the entire catalogue. The 1996 Remaster of Brothers In Arms is quite good and while not as dynamic as the original mastering, better in all other respects including EQ.
     
    progrocker and albertop like this.
  7. bigfix

    bigfix New Member

    Original Dire Straits - Brothers in Arms CD released and purchased in 1985
    VS.
    2005 20th anniversary remastered by Bob Ludwig

    Comparing the first track "So Far Away"

    Dynamic Range
    2005 - 8
    1985 - 20

    Wave form
    Top is 2005, lower is 1985

    [​IMG]

    Even without knowing what the DR was or seeing the waveform or having any prior knowledge of brick-walling I could hear something that was awful about the 2005 remaster.

    My 1985 version is a killer and sounds fantastic so I have no reason to chase after the elusive "good remaster".

    I've also done listening comparisons of Making Movies.
    Warner 2000 SBM remaster 1 47771-2
    vs.
    an original Made in Japan (Sanyo) 3480-2

    IMHO the original sounds much nicer and when I compared the wave forms I found similar to BIA comparison.

    I also have an original DS self titled and the Japanese SACD only version and in that case the original (not remastered) sounds good, but the SACD sounds better.

    So JJAY with all due respect your generalization is not true in my experience.

    I suspect that in some of these cases when a person thinks the remaster sounds great it is because their listening system is not good enough to reveal the truth.

    I should know because I used to have a fairly average system and in 2008 I upgraded to a much better system and I have since discovered that a lot of my original CDs purchased in the 80's and early 90's have hidden treasure I never knew was there.
     
    Gardo likes this.
  8. Ulli

    Ulli Forum Resident

    Location:
    Germany
    Did you see my post and the one by Mohojo?
     
  9. johnHS

    johnHS Forum Resident

    Dumped my remasters some time ago and got the original Warner Bros. CDs back.

    S/T-Japan Target
    Communique-Japan Target
    Making Movies-Japan for US
    Love Over Gold-US WEA pressing
    Brothers In Arms-WG for US
    On Every Street- US WEA pressing


    Never let go of the Money for Nothing/Best of disc.
     
  10. jjay

    jjay Forum Resident

    Location:
    MN United States
    Correct.
    McIntosh, Magnepan, ML & JL Audio system isn't good enough to reveal the truth? LOL
     
    dav-here likes this.
  11. eelkiller

    eelkiller One of the great unwashed

    Location:
    Northern Ontario
    Post waveform first, read later. ;)

    1996 - original Bob Ludwig remastering of Dire Straits catalogue, pretty nice sound IMO. First album has complete tracks unlike some early discs (Vertigo Blue Swirl and Orange fan discs for example).

    2005 - Brothers in Arms remaster - compressed mess with waveform sending people running into the streets.

    2011, 2012 - DS catalogue up to Brothers In Arms on SHM-SACD - verdict is still out on S/T and Love Over Gold. Guessing the old discs win out as per usual.
     
    dav-here and albertop like this.
  12. everton

    everton Forum Resident

    Location:
    Canada
    I agree. It seems to me that Mark Knopfler's voice is slightly more prominent in this remastered version. And so you hear more texture and it sounds more lifelike, at least for the Love over Gold and Brothers in Arms CDs. I can't tell much difference for Making Movies.
     
    albertop likes this.
  13. acdc7369

    acdc7369 Forum Resident

    Location:
    United States
    Ah Ok. I've never heard the 1996 remasters.
     
  14. acdc7369

    acdc7369 Forum Resident

    Location:
    United States
    Yeah. I'm not super impressed with the EQ moves on the original CD. It's not bad, it just sounds a little thin...not warm enough. But I would take that with all dynamics in tact over a compressed remaster any day, no matter how slight the compression is.
     
  15. Schmeig

    Schmeig Forum Resident

    Location:
    Kirkland, WA
    Thank you, and Merry Christmas to you as well!

    I do not have EAC installed to make the comparisons. A quick search revealed something called "Exact Audio Copy" - is this what you are referring to?

    I did listen to the Canadian Vertigo, and like it very much. To me, it sounded very smooth and dynamic. I also have a BMG Music Service version on Warner Bros. which appears to be a pre-remastered one, although I'm not totally sure. The booklet has that language you used to see on the early releases describing the CD format, which was generally not used for remastered versions. I'll have to do a listening comparison. I also have the LP on Quiex II vinyl which I picked up used in excellent condition a couple years ago for just a few dollars. This might just be one album where every version is a good one.
     
  16. PH416156

    PH416156 Alea Iacta Est

    Location:
    Europe
    yep, it's exact audio copy.

    Need help? This thread can give you the answers!

    http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/showthread.php?t=184533&highlight=eac
     
  17. I must admit, I'm a little confused about the "remastered" status for Brothers In Arms. As has been observed in the thread about the HDTracks "24/192" version of this BIA was originally recorded in Redbook digital. So, you're not going to get a "remaster" of it in the way you'd get a remaster of an album recorded in analog, such as the Beatles' 2009 sets or SH's work with Audio Fidelity. What you'd be getting could probably be better described as a "re-tweaking" of the original digital files.

    And what sort of re-tweaking was done? Well, to start off with, let's see some Dynamic Range Meter results. First up is the plain generic U.S. Warner Brothers original release (which just happens to be the first CD I ever purchased):


    Code:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Analyzed: Dire Straits / Brothers In Arms (Original CD Release)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DR         Peak         RMS     Duration Track
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    DR20       0.00 dB   -21.95 dB      5:13 01-So Far Away
    DR19       0.00 dB   -21.38 dB      8:26 02-Money For Nothing
    DR13      -5.95 dB   -21.49 dB      4:12 03-Walk Of Life
    DR14      -7.78 dB   -24.88 dB      6:34 04-Your Latest Trick
    DR13     -12.70 dB   -28.90 dB      8:31 05-Why Worry
    DR17      -2.43 dB   -23.32 dB      6:58 06-Ride Across The River
    DR14      -2.18 dB   -21.78 dB      4:40 07-The Man's Too Strong
    DR18       0.00 dB   -20.38 dB      3:41 08-One World
    DR15      -4.00 dB   -23.49 dB      6:56 09-Brothers In Arms
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Number of tracks:  9
    Official DR value: DR16
    And now, the remastered version:

    Code:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Analyzed: Dire Straits / Brothers In Arms (2006 Remaster)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DR         Peak         RMS     Duration Track
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    DR14      -0.20 dB   -15.66 dB      5:12 01-So Far Away
    DR11      -0.20 dB   -13.64 dB      8:26 02-Money For Nothing
    DR10      -0.20 dB   -12.81 dB      4:13 03-Walk Of Life
    DR13       0.00 dB   -14.77 dB      6:34 04-Your Latest Trick
    DR12      -3.01 dB   -18.47 dB      8:31 05-Why Worry
    DR12       0.00 dB   -15.19 dB      6:58 06-Ride Across The River
    DR12      -0.20 dB   -16.08 dB      4:40 07-The Man's Too Strong
    DR12      -0.20 dB   -13.79 dB      3:41 08-One World
    DR12      -0.20 dB   -16.01 dB      7:00 09-Brothers In Arms
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Number of tracks:  9
    Official DR value: DR12
    Yikes! Does the term "squashed flat as a pancake" seem an overstatement? :sigh: Considering that some here have professed a love for the remaster, I wonder if this could be "Exhibit A" for SH's contention that people actually prefer their music to be somewhat compressed? Oh, well, I suppose that all those listeners (if any) who complained about Why Worry being "too damned soft" will be happy now. And I'm sure the whole remaster sounds a lot better on iPod ear-buds...
     
  18. leshafunk

    leshafunk Forum Resident

    Location:
    Moscow, Russia
    DR12 is still quite good figure.
     
  19. Not when compared to DR16 for the same source. And look at Money For Nothing. DR19 on the old CD, DR11 on the new one!
     
  20. DR19 - that is very dynamic.
     
  21. leshafunk

    leshafunk Forum Resident

    Location:
    Moscow, Russia
    Finally there is a virus for Macs, so all iPods shall die soon :winkgrin:
     
  22. testikoff

    testikoff Seasoned n00b

    If you thought the 1996 remaster of BIA (not 2006 as you stated) was 'squashed', then take a look at 2005 BIA 20th Anniversary Edition HDCD (RBCD layer of hybrid SACD):

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Analyzed: Dire Straits / Brothers In Arms [2005 Remaster] (HDCD)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    DR Peak RMS Duration Track
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    DR8 -6.12 dB -15.53 dB 5:12 01-So Far Away
    DR7 -6.12 dB -15.64 dB 8:26 02-Money For Nothing
    DR6 -6.12 dB -14.20 dB 4:12 03-Walk Of Life
    DR8 -6.12 dB -15.85 dB 6:34 04-Your Latest Trick
    DR11 -6.12 dB -19.46 dB 8:31 05-Why Worry
    DR10 -6.12 dB -18.73 dB 6:58 06-Ride Across The River
    DR7 -6.12 dB -17.24 dB 4:40 07-The Man's Too Strong
    DR8 -6.12 dB -15.89 dB 3:40 08-One World
    DR8 -6.12 dB -17.07 dB 7:00 09-Brothers In Arms
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Number of tracks: 9
    Official DR value: DR8

    Samplerate: 44100 Hz
    Channels: 2
    Bits per sample: 24
    Bitrate: 760 kbps
    Codec: FLAC
    ======================================== ========================================


    Pushed even further by Bob Ludwig :( (who incredibly mastered all 3 BIA CD versions, I believe)...
     
  23. Lazlo Nibble

    Lazlo Nibble Forum Resident

    Location:
    Denver, Colorado
    Since we're throwing DR numbers around, here's the "early" European master (matrix 824 499-2 02 or 03) -- pretty much the same really:

    Code:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Analyzed: Dire Straits / Brothers In Arms [] 824 499-2 03 * []
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DR         Peak         RMS     Duration Track
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    DR20       0.00 dB   -21.86 dB      5:12 01-So Far Away
    DR18       0.00 dB   -20.62 dB      8:26 02-Money For Nothing
    DR13      -4.98 dB   -20.62 dB      4:12 03-Walk Of Life
    DR14      -7.61 dB   -25.12 dB      6:34 04-Your Latest Trick
    DR13     -12.86 dB   -28.84 dB      8:31 05-Why Worry
    DR17      -2.78 dB   -23.27 dB      6:58 06-Ride Across The River
    DR14      -3.21 dB   -22.75 dB      4:40 07-The Man's Too Strong
    DR18      -0.95 dB   -21.49 dB      3:41 08-One World
    DR15      -4.95 dB   -24.21 dB      6:59 09-Brothers In Arms
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Number of tracks:  9
    Official DR value: DR16
    And the version of the nightfly's "Original CD Release" with the glitch on "Your Latest Trick" (which pushes the track from DR14 to DR15 in the space of just a few samples :)):
    Code:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Analyzed: Dire Straits / Brothers In Arms [] 824 499-2 07 # []
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DR         Peak         RMS     Duration Track
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    DR20       0.00 dB   -21.91 dB      5:12 01-So Far Away
    DR19       0.00 dB   -21.38 dB      8:26 02-Money For Nothing
    DR13      -5.95 dB   -21.49 dB      4:13 03-Walk Of Life
    DR15      -0.22 dB   -24.88 dB      6:34 04-Your Latest Trick
    DR13     -12.70 dB   -28.90 dB      8:31 05-Why Worry
    DR17      -2.43 dB   -23.32 dB      6:58 06-Ride Across The River
    DR14      -2.18 dB   -21.79 dB      4:40 07-The Man's Too Strong
    DR18       0.00 dB   -20.38 dB      3:41 08-One World
    DR15      -4.00 dB   -23.49 dB      6:57 09-Brothers In Arms
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Number of tracks:  9
    Official DR value: DR16
    Can anyone run the numbers on the fourth pre-remaster version (T1 peak @ 79.4%)?
     
  24. testikoff

    testikoff Seasoned n00b

    ^^^ Here you go:

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Analyzed: Dire Straits / Brothers In Arms
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    DR Peak RMS Duration Track
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    DR20 -2.00 dB -23.87 dB 5:12 01-So Far Away
    DR18 -2.00 dB -22.62 dB 8:26 02-Money For Nothing
    DR13 -6.98 dB -22.62 dB 4:13 03-Walk Of Life
    DR14 -9.61 dB -27.12 dB 6:34 04-Your Latest Trick
    DR13 -14.86 dB -30.84 dB 8:31 05-Why Worry
    DR17 -4.78 dB -25.27 dB 6:58 06-Ride Across The River
    DR14 -5.21 dB -24.75 dB 4:40 07-The Man's Too Strong
    DR18 -2.95 dB -23.49 dB 3:41 08-One World
    DR15 -6.95 dB -26.21 dB 6:59 09-Brothers In Arms
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Number of tracks: 9
    Official DR value: DR16

    Samplerate: 44100 Hz
    Channels: 2
    Bits per sample: 16
    Bitrate: 563 kbps
    Codec: FLAC
    ================================================================================
     
  25. It seems I have the same one as member "testikoff". I added the matrix info.

    Code:
    foobar2000 1.1.10 / Dynamic Range Meter 1.1.1
    log date: 2012-04-07 10:11:32
    
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Analyzed: Dire Straits / Brothers In Arms [matrix: 824 499-2 11 *]
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DR         Peak         RMS     Duration Track
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    DR20      -2.00 dB   -23.87 dB      5:12 01-So Far Away
    DR18      -2.00 dB   -22.62 dB      8:26 02-Money For Nothing
    DR13      -6.98 dB   -22.62 dB      4:12 03-Walk Of Life
    DR14      -9.61 dB   -27.12 dB      6:34 04-Your Latest Trick
    DR13     -14.86 dB   -30.84 dB      8:31 05-Why Worry
    DR17      -4.78 dB   -25.27 dB      6:58 06-Ride Across The River
    DR14      -5.21 dB   -24.75 dB      4:40 07-The Man's Too Strong
    DR18      -2.95 dB   -23.49 dB      3:41 08-One World
    DR15      -6.95 dB   -26.21 dB      6:59 09-Brothers In Arms
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Number of tracks:  9
    Official DR value: DR16
    
    Samplerate:        44100 Hz
    Channels:          2
    Bits per sample:   16
    Bitrate:           1411 kbps
    Codec:             CDDA
    ================================================================================
    
    
    I am quite surprised to see so many different versions of the pre-remaster.

    Isn't the Japan for US Warner Bros. different from these? Maybe someone could post peak levels of that version also.
     

Share This Page

molar-endocrine