Star Trek: The Motion Picture - Underrated?

Discussion in 'Visual Arts' started by Ophelia, Jan 4, 2017.

  1. Ophelia

    Ophelia Forum Resident Thread Starter

    Location:
    New York, New York
    Do you agree with me that this film should have a better reputation than it does? I feel that yes, while it drags in places, it at least tries to do something new and ambitious with Trek. I love the costume design and the sets as well - it really feels like a true science fiction film. It's cerebral with a great message. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy the later TOS films. But this one, and IV, are my favorites. Both films, I feel, capture the two sides of the original series the best. TMP I feel captures the philosophical subtext of many of the episodes and expands upon it - it's a sci-fi film that is also a rumination on life; The Voyage Home is a homage to the series' less serious episodes and harkens back to the more fun episodes such as The Trouble with Tribbles.

    While I truly enjoyed Wrath of Khan earlier in life, I know feel it is kind of a run of the mill action sci fi film. It works for what it is, but while a more accessible film than TMP, and while more serious than The Voyage Home, it doesn't feel much in common with the TV series.
     
    Dansk, omikron, The Pinhead and 12 others like this.
  2. EddieVanHalen

    EddieVanHalen Forum Resident

    Despite its bad reputation this is by far my favourite Star Trek movie. Plot is interesting, clever, I think it gives an epic touch to the Star Trek franchise. Sets look good and I do like costumes also. The views of the V'jer cloud are a real beauty. The Jerry Goldsmith soundtrack is outstanding, wonderful music, the best score Star Trek has ever had.
    Yes, I also feel is an underrated movie.
     
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2017
    Dansk, Blastproof, omikron and 16 others like this.
  3. The Hermit

    The Hermit Wavin' that magick glowstick since 1976

    The theatrical cut was a bore, but Robert Wise's 2001 director's edition is a much better film even though it runs about four minutes longer; the editing and pacing is tighter, effects shots are finished, etc. It's still a flawed film but at least a noble effort to attempt something more cerebral than the myriad of Star Wars clones flying about at the time. The director's cut turns an altogether meh film into a reasonably good one.

    It's not everyone's cup of tea, but at least I rate them for the effort, and the fact it still looks spectacular 37 years later is a testament to the genius of Douglas Trumbull...
     
    Dansk, omikron, enro99 and 3 others like this.
  4. viper66

    viper66 Forum Resident

    Location:
    New Jersey
    I personally would have like to have seen the originally planned for tv series Star Trek Phase 2, But we got TMP instead.
    The series would have used the original series uniforms and weapons, Along with the Enterprise that more resembled TOS ship slightly refitted.
    (The downside is, Leanard Nimoy would not be involved in another Star Trek series.)

    But Star Trek TMP is probably my favorite of the original series of movies.
    The story was good, the cast was still young, and we got the beautiful Persus Khambata !:yikes::love:
    I didn't like the new uniforms, but were better than the heavy millitery uniforms from Khan on up.

    It was great to see the original cast in a new adventure again regardless of the flaws!:thumbsup:
     
  5. No Static

    No Static Gain Rider

    Location:
    Heart of Dixie
    Watching it again during treadmill runs this week.

    It seemed to work very hard at reintroducing everyone to the program: for example the extensive shots of the Enterprise at to beginning and the first warp jump, which some may see as boring. Not me.

    The only place where it drug for me was the long FX before the arrival at v'igr. But I was so happy to have Star Trek back I didn't mind...
     
    The Revealer likes this.
  6. Rfreeman

    Rfreeman Senior Member

    Location:
    Lawrenceville, NJ
    I was so psyched to see this and saw one of the first showings when it was released, but found it a colossal bore. Felt like it spent 10-15 minutes slowly panning around the model of the ship. That's entertainment?

    Yeah, it is a much prettier model than they used on the TV show. But the TV show generally had more plot in 23 minutes than this had in 2.5 hours or whatever it was.
     
    The macerator and Bluesman Mark like this.
  7. Monosterio

    Monosterio Forum Resident

    Location:
    South Florida
    Sheldon Cooper: "Star Trek I is orders of magnitude worse than Star Trek V. ... [It] fails across the board -- art direction, costuming, music, sound editing."
     
  8. Jerry Horne

    Jerry Horne WYWH (1975-2025)

    Location:
    NW
    My favorite Trek film. See it in a theater if you can.
     
    Scooterpiety and Manimal like this.
  9. npgchris

    npgchris Forum Resident


    While everyone is certainly entitled to their opinion, criticizing the music in this film is hard to fathom. Not only is Jerry Goldsmith's score the best Trek score ever, it's often acknowledged as one of the finest science fiction scores ever. Given how often it's been emulated, I'm surprised anyone would actually write that!

    As far as the topic itself, I would agree that it's underrated. Not every sci-fi film has to whiz by with gratuitous explosions and eye candy every couple of minutes. While it has its flaws, it's an ambitious film, and like it or not, without its success there never would have been a Trek film franchise in the first place. I agree that the later Director's Cut improved it in several ways, and wish we could get that version on Blu-ray someday!
     
    enro99, Nipper, Chris M and 3 others like this.
  10. Carl Swanson

    Carl Swanson Senior Member

    I enjoy the film and I think it was done well enough.

    But it didn't fit the Star Trek "brand". It had little action compared to the normal run of S/T franchises.
     
  11. feinstei9415

    feinstei9415 Forum Resident

    Location:
    South Bend, IN
    It always amazed me that the Star Trek movies were the genesis of the careers of stars who were in the TV show "7th Heaven". Of course, Stephen Collins is now disgraced, but he and Catherine Hicks were pretty prominent stars of the Star Trek movies.
     
    David Campbell likes this.
  12. Gaslight

    Gaslight ⎧⚍⎫⚑

    Location:
    Northeast USA
  13. feinstei9415

    feinstei9415 Forum Resident

    Location:
    South Bend, IN
    It's too bad that the concept of "The Borg" wasn't around when Star Trek: The Motion Picture was made. V'Ger was a product of a machine intelligence that could have been "the Borg"....
     
    rufus t firefly and seed_drill like this.
  14. jtiner

    jtiner Forum Resident

    Location:
    Maine
    I'd say TMP is by far my favorite of the series, especially the director's cut as pointed out upthread. It's the only film in the series that felt like TOS to me (except the Decker and Ilia characters). I've always felt that in each subsequent film, the main characters became parodies of themselves and that ruined it for me. I suppose after TMP I'd say II and VI are O.K., but I really don't care for III, IV, and V at all.
     
    altaeria and Scooterpiety like this.
  15. Oatsdad

    Oatsdad Oat, Biscuits, Abbie & Mitzi: Best Dogs Ever

    Location:
    Alexandria VA
    BZync, omikron, The macerator and 4 others like this.
  16. mBen989

    mBen989 Senior Member

    Location:
    Scranton, PA
    Thanks for reminding me why I stopped watching CinemaSins.
     
    Scooterpiety likes this.
  17. mx20

    mx20 Enthusiast

    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    I like it. A bit gratuitous with the long, slow pace of the film, but it's a really engaging plot. The only other Trek film that I like is Khan, which is more of a traditional sci-fi action flick and less like a "Star Trek for the big screen" film.
     
  18. The Hermit

    The Hermit Wavin' that magick glowstick since 1976

    I forgot to mention and give due credit to visual effects whiz John Dykstra in the above post; his starship sequences in that film still look incredible today by any standard. What a pity he didn't stay on and finish the effects shots in David Lynch's Dune he was originally supposed to work on, it would have looked magisterial if he had...
     
    Frozensoda likes this.
  19. Daniel Plainview

    Daniel Plainview God's Lonely Man

    It's ok. It's a little stiff. Needs more smiles. But I appreciate it for what it is.
     
    enro99 likes this.
  20. agentalbert

    agentalbert Senior Member

    Location:
    San Antonio, TX
    Its my favorite of the entire series. I think it effectively captured the mystery, imagination and spirit of discovery that the original series had.
     
    polchik, Jim N., Holy Diver and 3 others like this.
  21. joefont

    joefont Senior Member

    I think it's rated accurately. :shrug:
     
  22. It is slow paced to a fault. I do like the story.
     
  23. tommy-thewho

    tommy-thewho Senior Member

    Location:
    detroit, mi
    The directors cut I thought was a big improvement.

    Best music of any of the movies. Jerry Goldsmith did an excellent job on the score.

    Khan first and maybe a tie with 4.
     
  24. Oatsdad

    Oatsdad Oat, Biscuits, Abbie & Mitzi: Best Dogs Ever

    Location:
    Alexandria VA
    Can you explain what changes you think helped?

    When I watched the DC in 2001, I wanted to find improvements, but I thought it remained as slow and turgid as ever...
     
  25. Dr. Funk

    Dr. Funk Vintage Dust

    Location:
    Fort Worth TX
    The Director's Cut is my favorite from the Star Trek canon. I watch it a least twice a year.
     

Share This Page

molar-endocrine