Supertramp query

Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by btomarra, Aug 28, 2002.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. btomarra

    btomarra Classic Rock Audiophile Thread Starter

    Location:
    Little Rock, AR
    I did a search on "Supertramp" and found several threads containing divided opinions on the MOFI CDs and the remasters. If I want the best sounding CDs of Breakfast In America and Crime of the Century, which remasters should I hunt down?

    Thanks,

    Brian
     
  2. Steve Hoffman

    Steve Hoffman Your host Your Host

    Location:
    Los Angeles
  3. btomarra

    btomarra Classic Rock Audiophile Thread Starter

    Location:
    Little Rock, AR
    Steve,

    Thanks a million! Always respect your good advice!

    Brian
     
  4. SteveSDCA

    SteveSDCA Senior Member

    Location:
    San Diego
    The ones that were remastered in Europe a few years ago are good too. I used to have the MOFI ones but I had to sell them.
     
  5. Mike V

    Mike V New Member

    Location:
    Connecticut
    Wow, Dave's holding off about the differnence (thin veil removed) between the UD1 and UD2 versions. You OK there Dave? Just checkin' buddy ;)
     
  6. Dob

    Dob New Member

    Location:
    Detroit
    I'm thinking that if there was a difference worth mentioning between the UD1 and UD2 MFSL Supertramp CDs, SH would have mentioned them. Some UD1s and UD2s are identical.
     
  7. Mike V

    Mike V New Member

    Location:
    Connecticut
    My comment was purely tongue-in-cheek!
     
  8. Dob

    Dob New Member

    Location:
    Detroit
    Of course. Watch which buttons you're pushing, though;)
     
  9. snowman

    snowman Forum Resident

    Location:
    England
    I read in this forum that the Mofi Supertramp CD's are extremely low in volume (or dynamically demanding?). This put me off buying them.
    I have the European remasters, which I think sound great.
     
  10. JoelDF

    JoelDF Senior Member

    Location:
    Prairieville, LA
    Isn't that what the volume control knob is for on your amplifier?:D

    Joel
     
  11. Kevin Sypolt

    Kevin Sypolt Senior Member

    Location:
    Wilmington, NC
    They will have to pry my UD1 and UD2 Supertramp Breakfast in America CDs out of my cold, stiff fingers... They both sound THAT good to me. :cool:
     
  12. Drew

    Drew Senior Member

    Location:
    Grand Junction, CO

    I believe I was the one who mentioned that the MFSL Crime of the Century Gold CD is the only the CD I own that really isn't loud enough with a 3.5 watt single ended triode amp and a 97 db/watt/@ 1m speaker. If you have more watts or a higher sensitivity speaker that probably won't be an issue to you.

    I do have to say that there are a few other MFSL Gold CD's that are marginally close in this regard. Now before anyone says that I feel this way because I'm used to that "maximized" sound, I need to point out that I don't have this problem with any CD in my collection remastered by Mr. Hoffman.
     
  13. Metralla

    Metralla Joined Jan 13, 2002

    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    Do you know for sure that Steve has made this examination? I first acquired the UDII of "Crime...", and later the UDI. I compared them and sold the UDII. The difference was small but the decision was easy.

    Regards,
    Geoff
     
  14. snowman

    snowman Forum Resident

    Location:
    England
    Yes ! :D . Unfortunately, my setup is not the loudest, particularly with headphones where the headphone amp is not the most sensitive using HD 600's.
    I agree, Drew. No problem with the DCC's in the volume aspect. I think the earlier Mofi's had this problem?....
    The Mofi Pink Floyd Dark side of the Moon is a good example. What happens is for a decent volume, my amp is like at 12 oclock, which introduces massive hiss and current noise (from the amp), which degrades the sound :mad:
    The Elton John Madman across the Water is another example, as are the original Dire Straits CD's.
     
  15. Dob

    Dob New Member

    Location:
    Detroit
    No, I don't recall any SH posts on that subject.

    However, this opportunity for comment was declined, and silence usually implies consent.
     
  16. Steve Hoffman

    Steve Hoffman Your host Your Host

    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Silence in this case means: "Leave me out of it for political reasons, dudes".

    So let me just say this:


    If the UDII of Supertramp is as low in volume as the UDI, you can be assured that the sound will be pretty much the same. I don't have both to find out. If the volume level of the UDII has been increased, avoid it.

    HOW'S THAT?
     
  17. Dave

    Dave Esoteric Audio Research Specialistâ„¢

    Location:
    B.C.
    Mike and gang.

    Metralla adaquetely stated what my opinion is and Mike revealed why. It makes it that much easier for me. Less typing!:winkgrin:

    As for the lack of volume on some of the earlier MoFi's it was stated by Sckott I believe, that it's a particular type of mastering and the reason behind it is that they didn't want the peaks in the music to go into distortion because they weren't using any noise reduction and very little compression on those older recordings as well as they wanted to preserve the sonic qualities of the original recordings and at the time this was the only effective way to achieve this.
     
  18. Dob

    Dob New Member

    Location:
    Detroit
    FWIW, my UD2 of Crime Of The Century is extremely low in level. I can't imagine the UD1 being any quieter.

    Steve, would you say that the UD1/UD2 level difference you mentioned would/could apply to any of the MoFi CDs (not just the Supertramp)?
     
  19. Steve Hoffman

    Steve Hoffman Your host Your Host

    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Don't know.

    Case by case basis, always.
     
  20. Metralla

    Metralla Joined Jan 13, 2002

    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    In my comparison I did not notice any difference in the overall levels. The UDI and UDII appear to be recorded at the same low level.

    I had a problem with the very low level on the UDII and went looking for a UDI, expecting that possibly it was recorded at a slightly higher volume that would make it easier to set a suitable listening level with my SET rig. I did not get that.

    I did hear a touch more life and a slightly better dynamic contrast. I felt I was hearing a little more inner detail and I seemed to enjoy the disc more. I don't think it was a big difference at all, and unless one has both discs to run the comparison, you are probably going to find it hard to distinuish the two. It's not something to worry about. They both sound superb and the music is legendary.

    But if you have a choice, get the UDI. I was patient on eBuy and actually got the UDI for a tad less than I paid for the UDII. I lost no money selling the UDII.

    Regards,
    Geoff
     
  21. Dave

    Dave Esoteric Audio Research Specialistâ„¢

    Location:
    B.C.
    Well stated Sir Metralla.:winkgrin:
     
  22. Paul C.

    Paul C. Senior Member

    Location:
    Australia
    I will add that the newer US remaster of "Even in the Quietest moments" sounds pretty fresh, if a little bright. Seems to me that a number of the old Supertramp recording were pretty bright to begin with (ie. the steel string guitars, and Roger Hodgson's voice), so if the transfer is toppy, it can sound a bit much. The new CD sounds more lively than my old German LP copy. Don't have any other versions to compare
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

molar-endocrine