The most poorly/worst mastered CDs EVER!

Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by stipe, Jul 18, 2011.

  1. Chooke

    Chooke Forum Resident

    Location:
    Perth, Australia
    Was that because of the mastering or a poor source tape?
     
  2. Mr wiggles

    Mr wiggles Forum Resident

    Location:
    Edinburgh
    Probably the wrong thread but. I'm sitting here listening to john lennons instant karma. On a deeper level quite possibly my favourite lyric ever but the production and arrangement are artrocious
     
  3. Mr wiggles

    Mr wiggles Forum Resident

    Location:
    Edinburgh
    Just like to ad. If George Martin got his hands on this it would have been the best
     
  4. MLutthans

    MLutthans That's my spaghetti, Chewbacca! Staff

    The concurrently-released LP sounded fine.
     
  5. pool_of_tears

    pool_of_tears Searching For Simplicity

    Location:
    Midwest
    How did I miss that comment?! That is funny
     
  6. Chooke

    Chooke Forum Resident

    Location:
    Perth, Australia
    Doesn't mean it came from the same tape source, but what I meant does it sound bad because of poor mastering, eg EQ choices, excessive compression?
    I agree though, a bad sounding CD is bad sounding regardless of the cause.
     
  7. Blue Cactus

    Blue Cactus Forum Resident

    Location:
    Illinois
    I think John really wanted it to sound like that. In other words, he didn't really want a polished sound.
     
    phillyal1 likes this.
  8. ronm

    ronm audiofreak

    Location:
    southern colo.
    Off hand have you heard or can recommend a better version on CD?
     
  9. ponkine

    ponkine Senior Member

    Location:
    Villarrica, Chile
    Yes, absolutely

    Both the first Japan pressing and the Austria picture disc smokes the 1994 definitive remaster

    I remember having the MCA, and I didn't like it. I recommend the Japanese 1st edition and the Austria picture disc

    :wave:

    [​IMG]
     
    scocs and Randoms like this.
  10. ronm

    ronm audiofreak

    Location:
    southern colo.
    Thanks.I really like this but knew or hoped there was better.I may have the 2005 mca.
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2018
    ponkine likes this.
  11. c-eling

    c-eling Dinner's In The Microwave Sweety

    As I stated before, these Virgin boxes use previously released mastering's. For a cheaper alternative search out the UK CD CASSCD20
     
  12. TimB

    TimB Pop, Rock and Blues for me!

    Location:
    Colorado
    Yes it is truly awful!
     
  13. eyeCalypso

    eyeCalypso Forum Resident

    Location:
    Colorado, USA
    This. It does sound awful! The fat boy edition was what made me realize how important mastering is and that even the majors can really screw up.
     
    DTK likes this.
  14. Atmospheric

    Atmospheric Forum Resident

    Location:
    Eugene
    True enough if you want to split hairs. But it most definitely does not in any way shape or form measure LOUDNESS, which was the assertion I was responding to.

    DR stands for "Dynamic Range." Yes, there may be some finer points to how that is measured or how accurate it is, but that's the measurement. For example, DR=10 means that there is 10db of dynamic range between the loudest and softest points in the sample, subject to some amount of error. Whether the samples are peak, RMS, crest, whatever. The measured value is still dynamic range, not loudness.
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2018
    sunspot42 likes this.
  15. Atmospheric

    Atmospheric Forum Resident

    Location:
    Eugene
    Actually, when I hear people talk about "loudness," they almost always mean that it's too damned loud. True about the correlation thing. But reduced DR is only the means to an end. Generally, you have to squash the hell out of something to make it loud. Correlation is not causation. In this case, trying to correlate a low DR value with music being too loud is just erroneous. Yeah, it probably is most of the time, but not necessarily so. I think we're in substantial agreement on this. I'd just prefer that if folks are going to complain that mastering is too loud, that they instead talk about some replay gain value (or adjustment) needed to bring it back to some agreed upon reasonable level that's all. I use a replay gain tool for all my music.

    The worst offender required a whopping -8.4db gain adjustment to bring it back to zero on my metered audio interface. That recording happens to be Dwight Yoakam "Guitars, Cadillacs, Etc., Etc." The DR for that recording is DR=7. Pretty horrendous. But my lowest DR recording is a DR=5, which didn't require as much replay gain adjustment.

    Sorry, I write manuals for a living. Being specific and accurate about things is kind of what I do.
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2018
    dartira likes this.
  16. DTK

    DTK Forum Resident

    Location:
    Europe
    I take it to mean you don't like the fatboy yes? I tried to get into Brew for a while listening to the fatboy but couldn't...then I bought the remaster and it clicked; I could actually hear the basis of the music; bass lines, which were buried on the ole fatboy...
     
  17. MrBitey

    MrBitey Forum Resident

    Location:
    United Kindom
    I bought the CD release of Kiss Alive! When it came out. Horrible shrill metallic noises made it almost unlistenable. I took it back to the shop at the time as I thought it must be faulty. The replacement was no better. I think I’ve listened to it once all the way through in 20+ years.
     
  18. Thoughtships

    Thoughtships Forum Resident

    Location:
    Devon, UK
    Paul McCartney - Memory Almost Full

    The worst I think I've ever heard. Whoever mastered that should be banned from going within a hundred yards of anything vaguely musical.
     
    JPH2000, Scope J and yesstiles like this.
  19. Hawkwind’s Onward and Blood of the Earth. I can’t listen for more than 15 minutes without my ears hurting.
     
  20. samthesham

    samthesham Forum Resident

    Location:
    Moorhead MN
    2009 Beatles White Album in spots it
    sounds like a completely different album.I ccan't even listen to it.Back in the USSR is compressed as hell and things just worse as the record plays.
     
  21. WonkyWilly

    WonkyWilly Forum Resident

    Location:
    Paradise, PA
    Oh, god yes. It's mono but they EQ'd each channel differently to give it "depth". Then they jacked the upper midrange to ungodly levels. Probably one of the most incompetent digital masterings ever released. Reportedly, Sony wasn't at all pleased but Neil & his "engineer" scoffed at the notion that anybody would dislike it and demanded its release.
     
    C6H12O6 and Galley like this.
  22. InStepWithTheStars

    InStepWithTheStars It's a miracle, let it alter you

    Location:
    North Carolina


    Skip to 2:09 and turn yer volume down! (Though this video is about 50% of the volume of the CD)

    (Apart from the monolithic wall of clipping, though, the song is fantastic!)
     
  23. Randoms

    Randoms Aerie Faerie Nonsense

    Location:
    UK
    Yes, all three discs sound good in this set.
     
    ponkine likes this.
  24. James_S888

    James_S888 Forum Resident

    Anything rock n roll that Stephen Marcussen has touched in the last ten years
     
    eyeCalypso likes this.
  25. Basenote66

    Basenote66 Forum Resident

    Location:
    London
    It's so bad I can't even listen to it,
     
    Thoughtships likes this.

Share This Page

molar-endocrine