AC DC- Best Cd Versions?

Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by Music_dude, Nov 20, 2017.

  1. Music_dude

    Music_dude Forum Resident Thread Starter

    Location:
    Canada
    I’m looking to re-obtain Dirty Deeds, Highway To Hell and Fly On The Wall from Amazon. It seems most cd’s are remasters, but I’m unsure which ones sound the best. I’ve also seen an import remaster from Epic Europe, but again I’m unsure as to the sound quality. Can anyone provide some assistance, or provide some good links? I don’t want to make the wrong purchase here. Thanks!
     
  2. pool_of_tears

    pool_of_tears Searching For Simplicity

    Location:
    Midwest
    Avoid the 2003 Epic cd's...brickwalled, big time. The 1994 Atco cd's are OK, but a tad loud.

    Your best bet is to go after the 1980's Atlantic discs and/or the 1980's Albert A.U. discs
     
    Texado, MYQ1, Vinylbeast and 18 others like this.
  3. Music_dude

    Music_dude Forum Resident Thread Starter

    Location:
    Canada
    Any links to the original discs on Amazon?
     
  4. DiabloG

    DiabloG City Pop, Rock, and anything 80s til I die

    Location:
    United States
    Highway to Hell
    Fly on the Wall

    I can't find a listing for Dirty Deeds. The only 2003 remasters I have are Powerage and Fly on the Wall. They have good EQ, but are marred by excessive compression. Most of my other AC/DC CDs are the original Atlantics, though I have the 90s remasters of Dirty Deeds and Highway to Hell. Neither of them are bad.
     
    Music_dude likes this.
  5. Music_dude

    Music_dude Forum Resident Thread Starter

    Location:
    Canada
    Thanks for this... very much appreciated!
     
  6. bluenote

    bluenote Forum Resident

    Location:
    Toronto
    I'm probably in the minority, but I prefer the '03 remasters. I find they have a lot more punch then the original 80's discs. They are brickwalled yes, but I will take the extra kick over the originals.
     
  7. John Buchanan

    John Buchanan I'm just a headphone kind of fellow. Stax Sigma

    I'm coming to the conclusion that every time I hear the phrase "more punch" I know that that remaster is going to sound awful. The Sony remasters are awful. Too compressed and bright.
     
  8. jeffrey walsh

    jeffrey walsh Senior Member

    Location:
    Scranton, Pa. USA
    Have and love the 94 remastered, had all the original pressings before and dumped them. Never heard the Sonys nor do I care, I'm happy with what I have.
     
    sunking101, tmtomh, Brudr and 2 others like this.
  9. Dave

    Dave Esoteric Audio Research Specialist™

    Location:
    B.C.
    @Music_dude it will help to list your equipment in your profile to receive appropriate sonics advice.
     
    klockwerk and hi_watt like this.
  10. RnRmf

    RnRmf Senior Member

    Location:
    Orlando, FL and NJ
    It's a bit of a trade off. I've warmed to the '03 Epic remasters and I don't write them off.
    I have the original USA Atlantic and Australian Albert cd's from the 80's, as well.
    I never liked the 90's Atco's. I'd actually like to hear one, again, since it's been at least 20 years since I heard one.

    It's a bit of a trade off with what you get in the different versions. My opinion isn't an across the board recommendation for any particular version and is a broad generalization of my opinion about them. The '03 versions have denser tonality, across the board in guitar, bass, drums, and vocals, that sounds pretty good, to me. I really don't find them overly bright. I mean, it's AC/DC and the overdriven guitar has those elements in it. So, tonally, I like the 03's but they are obviously compressed.
    The 80's versions (Atlantic and Albert's are different) sound more natural without the compression but can sound a bit thin by comparison to the 03 remasters. Although, when listening to them you might not notice because they sound really good, too.

    Essentially, I'd get the 80's Atlantics or the 03 Epic's. If you see them for sale, brand new, you are almost guaranteed for them to be the 03 Epic's. I'd assume that's the cheapest solution.
     
  11. Dynamic Ranger

    Dynamic Ranger Forum Resident

    Location:
    Old Town, Maine
    The 2003 remasters are to be avoided at all costs! Clipping, brickwalled distortion is all you'll get from them. (And an ugly headache too!)

    The 1994 ATCO remasters are ok! But are still pretty loud. I tried listening to one of them (Highway to Hell, I think.) And the sound just wasn't really to my liking. Again though, these are nowhere near as bad as the 2003 remasters. Those are sonic garbage!

    The original 1980's Atlantic CDs will give you the best sound overall. And what's better? Some (or most) of them were mastered by Barry Diament! (An Audio-God.)
    Crank them up! And enjoy!
     
    Texado, MYQ1, Xabby and 9 others like this.
  12. Tony Cruse

    Tony Cruse Tc

    Location:
    Essex, UK.
    The Epic 2003 reissues sound amazing to my ears. Each cd is in a cardboard gatefold sleeve with a pretty decent booklet.
     
  13. Sentient Six

    Sentient Six Forum Resident

    Location:
    Annandale, NJ USA
    The only 1994 Atco I would recommend is Let There Be Rock. It has a bit more bottom end to it and cuts out some of the shrillness of the 80's CD. If you can find the Australian version of it, even better for the different track listing.

    Otherwise, the 80's CDs are the way to go. The US discs are popping up more in the used shops. If you have a rich aunt/uncle/parent/grandparent, get the Japan for Australian CDs.
     
    Rockin' Robby and Dynamic Ranger like this.
  14. paulisdead

    paulisdead fast and bulbous

    For the original Australian Albert Productions albums get the original 1987 Made In Japan or the 1989 or 1993 Australian pressed editions (with either silver or black Alberts discs). Don't bother with the 1994 Alberts reissues of Dirty Deeds and T.N.T. as they feature the international edits taken from the ATCO CDs.

    High Voltage
    CDP 746667 2 (Alberts/EMI - 1986 - Made In Japan)
    465250 2 (1989 - Alberts/CBS - Made In Australia)
    465250 2 (1993 - Alberts/Sony Music - Made In Australia)

    T.N.T.
    CDP 746272 2 (Alberts/EMI - 1986 - Made In Japan)
    465262 2 (1989 - Alberts/CBS - Made In Australia)
    465262 2 (1993 - Alberts/Sony Music - Made In Australia)

    Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap
    CDP 746273 2 (Alberts/EMI - 1986 - Made In Japan)
    465258 2 (1989 - Alberts/CBS - Made In Australia)
    465258 2 (1993 - Alberts/Sony Music - Made In Australia)

    Let There Be Rock
    CDP 746666 2 (Alberts/EMI - 1987 - Made In Japan)
    465256 2 (1989 - Alberts/CBS - Made In Australia)
    465256 2 (1993 - Alberts/Sony Music - Made In Australia)

    Just be aware that any older Australian AC/DC CDs have a RIDICULOUS premium on eBay. Especially considering how many were originally pressed.


     
    Last edited: Nov 20, 2017
  15. Tony Cruse

    Tony Cruse Tc

    Location:
    Essex, UK.
    I think Im starting to enjoy brickwalled cds then. They sound superb to me!
     
  16. joelee

    joelee Hyperactive!

    Location:
    Houston
    I hate compressed LOUD cds too but I don't mind theses EPIC releases, it's AC/DC!
     
  17. bbanderic

    bbanderic Forum Resident

    Unless AC/DC is your favorite band and you don't mind paying big bucks for the early Australian pressings, we're kind of stuck with the 2003 remasters for a reasonable price.
     
  18. Jerquee

    Jerquee Take this, brother, may it serve you well.

    Location:
    New York
    I have them all and default to the 94s.

    However I did recently make a comp from the black Alberts (Aus press) and I found myself really enjoying the sound. Hate 2003... nice top but no bottom. Give me the 2003 top and the 94 low end and I'm good.
     
    joelee, Kevin Sypolt and Brudr like this.
  19. Plectrum Electrum

    Plectrum Electrum Forum Resident

    Location:
    UK
    Add me to the list of those who like the 2003 remasters.
     
  20. The Hud

    The Hud Breath of the Kingdom, Tears of the Wild

    I have all 3 US CD sets, and all have their strengths and weaknesses.

    I do like that combined with the Backtracks box set, everything up to that point sounds the same with the 2003 remasters.
     
    Galley likes this.
  21. Jimmy B.

    Jimmy B. Be yourself or don't bother. Anti-fascism.

    Location:
    .
    Yes, AC/DC is never "sonic garbage."
     
  22. bbanderic

    bbanderic Forum Resident

    I just bought 2003 Epic version of Highway To Hell and I think it sounds fantastic. Clearly sounds like it's from master source with great clarity and a lot of kick. Perhaps it's mastered a bit loud but it's certainly not overbearing, some here say to avoid it and it sounds like crap, I'm not hearing that, I like it well enough that I'm getting the rest of the Bon Scott years on Epic.
     
  23. InStepWithTheStars

    InStepWithTheStars It's a miracle, let it alter you

    Location:
    North Carolina
    The 2003 George Marino Epic/Columbia remasters are my preferred AC/DC discs as well. I generally dislike overcompression, but to my ears it works here. I have a Diament-mastered Who Made Who and a '95 Jensen Back in Black and they both sound weak and wimpy to my ears. The '03 series, while super-compressed, sounds very powerful. Not sure how George Marino did it, because I've heard stuff with less compression that sounds much worse.

    The 2003 remasters are the ones up on Spotify and the like, you can check those out and determine if they're too compressed for you or not.
     
  24. fluffskul

    fluffskul Would rather be at a concert

    Location:
    albany, ny
    "Highway to Hell" Barry mastered is not from the original tapes. Still a very nice listen. However, the 90s remaster is from the original tapes... IIRC, Ted Jensen mastered. I keep both for this one. But for all other titles I only have Barry D original CDs. Barry's "Back in Black" is from master tapes, and can truly serve as a demo disc.
     
  25. bluenote

    bluenote Forum Resident

    Location:
    Toronto
    Wow, I'm shocked at how many in this thread prefer the '03's! This certainly wasn't the case in years past on this forum.
     

Share This Page

molar-endocrine