CKY - Volume 1 (Original Vs Remaster: Which Sounds Better?)

Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by Wickedfox, Jun 11, 2021.

Tags:
  1. Wickedfox

    Wickedfox New Member Thread Starter

    Location:
    York, PA
    Like The Title Says, Which Version Sounds Better In Audio Quality: The Original 1999 Release Or The 2001 Stephen Marcussen Remaster. Personally, I Think The Original Version (Mixed By The Band Themselves & Mastered By Walt Mecleary) Sounds Better. The 2001 Remaster Sound "Loud". I Just Want To Know B4 Buying The CD From Discogs. Thanks!
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2021
  2. Soundslave

    Soundslave Forum Resident

    Location:
    Tomsk,Russia
    Would like to know that as well :) It seems the remaster is a bit more detailed as well, but the compression is also there as you mentioned...
     
  3. Wickedfox

    Wickedfox New Member Thread Starter

    Location:
    York, PA
    Also sounds alittle Compressed as well.
     
  4. Soundslave

    Soundslave Forum Resident

    Location:
    Tomsk,Russia
    You mean the original sounds compressed? Well that's the way it was for alternative music since the end of 90's I think. Did you get both versions btw?
     
  5. Wickedfox

    Wickedfox New Member Thread Starter

    Location:
    York, PA
    No The Remaster Sounds Slightly Compressed. I Don't Have Either Version, I Listened To Them Through The Youtube Topic Channels / Youtube Music With Audio Quality On The Highest Settings
     
  6. Soundslave

    Soundslave Forum Resident

    Location:
    Tomsk,Russia
    Well, I thought you already stated in the first comment that remaster is louder hence a bit more compressed :) Okay, I thought you got either version so that decided to add something to the table in terms of sound comparison :)
     

Share This Page

molar-endocrine