J. J. Abrams HBO Westworld series

Discussion in 'Visual Arts' started by soundboy, Aug 30, 2013.

  1. vince

    vince Stan Ricker's son-in-law

    I just hope Aaron Paul isn't gonna be this 'sad-sack/monotone' character throughout the entire season!
     
    Lonson likes this.
  2. rjp

    rjp Senior Member

    Location:
    Ohio
    not too bad of an opener.

    we'll see if it moves along, or stagnates as many of these series seem to do.

    lots and lots of characters (really only dolores and bernard) not shown or mentioned in episode one......are they just gone, or are they all going to a storyline? (which will drag this out into boredom)
     
  3. chacha

    chacha Forum Resident In Memoriam

    Location:
    mill valley CA USA
    I gave up halfway in season 2. Would 3 make any sense without finishing 2?
     
  4. Vidiot

    Vidiot Now in 4K HDR!

    Location:
    Hollywood, USA
    I enjoyed the first episode of the new season, and I can see they're definitely going into a completely different direction.

    BTW, anybody notice the misspelling in the end credits? I can't believe a show this costly and important actually misspells words like this...

    [​IMG]

    "Producton"? What?

    (It's my curse that I read every word of every credit, plus I read fast. And I've been doing this since I was 8 or 9 years old. It's a "thing" of mine.)
     
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2020
    BGLeduc and chacha like this.
  5. I clearly missed the typo, but I did not miss the Animatronics credit for Garner Holt. Being Disney nerd, I recognized the name from their work on animatronics in the parks.

    Maybe they did the robot seen with Aaron Paul’s character? Some of that would surely be CG, but some looked practical.
     
    Vidiot likes this.
  6. Vidiot

    Vidiot Now in 4K HDR!

    Location:
    Hollywood, USA
    I think when you see right through a creature that has no skin, it's actually a mechanical figure on the set, and no doubt Holt would be part of the team that built it. There's always a balance between what to do live, right there with the actors, vs. doing it later on in post as CGI VFX.
     
    BGLeduc likes this.
  7. Looks like they were in WW starting at S1.

    Garner Holt on the Big and Little Screens
     
  8. The extra i blew the budget.
     
    Vidiot likes this.
  9. Lonson

    Lonson I'm in the kitchen with the Tombstone Blues

    I was so excited to see this return. A good opener. . . though I had some qualms about how Aaron's character just happens to be in "the right place at the right time" at the end. . . . Anyway, not a real stumbling block for me, will be interesting to see what situation Maeve is stuck in and why and who is the "core" in Tommy Flanagan's character (Teddy?) among other little mysteries.

    Looking forard to Episode 2. . . .
     
  10. vince

    vince Stan Ricker's son-in-law

    So, I don't have HD, so I can't see what's on Aaron Paul's phone, when he does those 'jobs'....
    While , at first, it's some kind of robbery, the other two seem like some discretionary work for rich people...Can anybody clarify this to me?
     
    Last edited: Mar 17, 2020
  11. GeetarFreek

    GeetarFreek Forum Resident

    Location:
    Montana
    So how many timelines are we dealing with here ?

    interesting start and mysterious as usual
     
  12. Lonson

    Lonson I'm in the kitchen with the Tombstone Blues

    I think one so far. I could be wrong.

    I love how "a simulation within a simulation" is mentioned in Episode 1 and in 2 we have a simulation.

    I also enjoyed how Episode 1 was Dolores/Bernard and 2 is Maeve/Bernard. And am happy to see Tommy Flanagan as a character though he could enunciate just a wee bit more clearly.
     
  13. jojopuppyfish

    jojopuppyfish Senior Member

    Location:
    Maryland
    So I hated the ending of last season. Out of pure bordeom the last few weeks, I watched the 2 new episodes from Season 3 and I don't know where this is going, but I have to admit I like it.
     
    Lonson and GentleSenator like this.
  14. Lonson

    Lonson I'm in the kitchen with the Tombstone Blues

    I like it too. I think it's interesting that we have the Machine and the machines and two human titans locking horns and three machine titans setting up positions and a war ramping up. There's a lot to come. . . "no. . no. . .no. . . no @#%&."
     
  15. Lonson

    Lonson I'm in the kitchen with the Tombstone Blues

    And what about "Game of Thrones World!"
     
  16. chrischerm

    chrischerm Forum Resident

    The 2 show creators and the Dragon was quite the cameo! :)
     
    Lonson likes this.
  17. vince

    vince Stan Ricker's son-in-law

    I didn't even get the 'Costa Rica' reference 'till I read someone talking about it on Yahoo news!:doh:
     
    chrischerm likes this.
  18. vince

    vince Stan Ricker's son-in-law

    So, does this mean the real Charlotte was dead before Season two?
     
  19. thegage

    thegage Forum Currency Nerd

    Well, they did play with timelines a lot in Season 2, but my sense is that the real Charlotte was killed just before they evacuated the survivors at the end of the season. But, I haven't gone back a rewatched the season to see if there are any solid clues.

    JohnK
     
  20. marmalade166

    marmalade166 Sous les pavés, la plage!

    Location:
    Aberdeen, Scotland
    I'm really enjoying this season, and I'm almost angry when the episode ends cos I'm loving it so much - and bloody hell Tessa Thompson was great in this episode!
     
    Lonson likes this.
  21. RexKramer

    RexKramer Senior Member

    Location:
    Outside of Philly
    It's an app for mercenaries. They post a general description of a job and you can choose whether or not to take the mission.
     
    vince likes this.
  22. I think it was the real Charlotte the one who came to supervise what was going on in Westworld/Delos Park, but at the end of season 2 she met her robot nemesis that told her something like "you wanted inmortality? Be careful what you whish for", and then she killed the real Charlotte.
    That tells us that Charlotte was not a simple employee/executive hired to get numbers right, she was deep within the company as she got her memory and body backed up, or maybe she didn't know?
    And a second question regarding her comes to mind, who activated the Charlotte robot nemesis?
     
  23. It may be my view but I can't see any filmgrain on season 3. Have they stopped shooting on 35 mm like seasons 1 & 2 and season 3 is shot digitally to better match the futuristic look of the real world?
     
  24. thegage

    thegage Forum Currency Nerd

    Dolores, I think.

    JohnK
     
  25. Dr. J.

    Dr. J. Music is in my soul

    Location:
    Memphis, TN
    Unlike a lot of people who post here, I loved Season 2 and thought it really ratcheted up so much from Season 1 in terms of character development, soundtrack, plot, story telling, and just over all feel. This season seems very measured and boring by comparison. I was prepared to have my mind blown, and then meh. Dolores' talk with Caleb was a cheap knockoff off of the Matrix. How could telling him about data collection and AI even be something surprising and revelatory in the future when it's our reality now?
     
    Lonson likes this.

Share This Page

molar-endocrine