1) You do remember that season one showed (and edited) physical video of the trial proceedings, yes? I would also add that you seem to be implying that they couldn't find someone to simply address the counterpoints, which ignores all the information they manipulated and sounds downright ridiculous at face value. The first season was filled with talking heads. If they wanted to find a talking head to address Avery's violent behavior (among other things)--which didn't make it into trial--they could have. 2) Yes, I think the documentary definitely has an agenda, even if they do in fact believe that Avery is innocent. Same goes for Zellner. 3) I've pointed you time and again to all the rebuttals over on Reddit. If you'd like to read them and then address specific points, I'm all for it. All I would request is that you stick with super_pickle since she's the one I trust.