Two new Class D Audio Amplifiers that use GaN (Gallium Nitride FET) transistors are now shipping to audio fans. The technology has been discussed on line for some time and has generated high anticipation and expectations. The GaN transistors allow for faster switching and low levels of negative feedback to reduce distortion to state of the art levels. A few user reviews on Audiogon forums are quite positive to say the least. The mainstream Peachtree audio version has 400 watts / channel and lists for $2999. The vendor direct Underwood HiFi LSA "Voyager" has 350 WPC and is $3000 US. These things are shipping without the ink being dry on their respective manufacturer's web sites. Anyone have a chance to hear these? Interesting times.
Honestly. We have 5 Class d amp here and none cost anywhere near three grand. Our most powerful spits our 275w @ 8ohm. And were using one as I type because it very hot here and these don't put out much heat. Thats the joy of DIY. Kinda dry compared to everything else here but, very detailed. The average consumer would be pleased. They're very silent in the quiet passages.
Very interested. Haven't heard (don't get around much anymore) but reviewers are doing backflips about the upscale AGD amps. If that level of performance, without the bling, is available for less coin, well, curiouser and curiouser. Though I've been a Tube Guy for most of my audiofiend existence, I once owned NuForce Ref 9 SE mkII amps and still think highly of them. Even Ralph of Atma-Sphere expects to bring a GaN amp to market.
Dynamic range spec is a little disappointing but benefit of the power output could make up for that with many speakers. Definitely an intriguing product. Hopefully we’ll see some independent bench measurements posted somewhere soon.
You're talking about the Peachtree? I see at least 112dB ... CDs can have a theorical 96dB maximum, and you depends more on recording mastering and speakers / acoustics dynamic range. In real life, people doesn't have much more than 70 / 80 dB. It's my opinion, of course, but an amplifier with 110dB can be totally enough. If we compare only with the theorical measurements, the nova 500 "it's better", but that doesn't mean a better amplifier in real life for someone, because maybe we're comparing inaudible stuff. Think about vinyl ... i listened to pretty good systems compared with digital sources and let me say that the difference it's much more in the recording that in theorical numbers. Maybe in top high end systems you can have another experience, i don't know, but generally theory and practice are equals only in theory.
Yes, was referring to the Peachtree. All its specs are a fair order of magnitude lower than SOTA with exception of its power output. I don’t know where you got those numbers but the dynamic range limitation of human hearing is approximately 115db, some sources claim even higher. My anecdotal experience is that these seemingly minute differences in performance specs matter, even at SOTA levels. Over the past couple weeks I’ve had three preamps in house for audition: the Quad Artera, Bel Canto Pre5 and Benchmark LA4. Each is a fully-balanced design, and respectively, represent progressively higher performance specs. The Bel Canto was a clear and obvious improvement in resolution over the Artera, as was the LA4 over the Canto. It was even apparent with some of the most highly compressed recordings, and with speakers that are probably 15 to 20% less resolving than the best I’ve heard. It’s my experience and belief that distortion and noise are almost always accumulative. Listening enjoyment through my reference system has improved with each progressive step in minimizing these factors. This doesn’t mean I can’t or don’t enjoy gear of lower resolution though. I still own and enjoy tube and phono gear. Another issue worth noting is that manufacturers commonly fudge these numbers to appear favorable on the spec sheet. I wouldn’t take Peachtree’s claims at face value. Its power output is attractive though, so I’d still consider trying one if the specs are as good as claimed, however, I’d like to see independent measurement results before taking the plunge.
Class D play well with some types of music. Bog Band, Classical, probably Electronica. When it comes to voices I'll use tubes.
Little blurb on the technical aspects of the GaN FET: "GaNFETs turned-on ~4 times faster and turned-off ~2 times faster reducing switching distortion (ringing) by several orders of magnitude. This, in-turn, allowed designers to use much less global negative feedback to achieve excellent measured results. The result is an amplifier with exceptional musicality and excellent measured performance."
Curious about how this sounds. I've auditioned several class D amps and they never seem to push my buttons.
I’m pretty sure I saw the Peachtree amp on Darko’s rack, so we’ll probably be getting his take on it soon.
Yeah...but it's really the residual noise that matters. There used to be, and surely still are, like 400W/channel amps specifying 120 dB dynamic range, however compared to 1W that is -94 dBW. Not better than a 20W amp of 107 dB dynamic range (if I'm doing the maths right). When I used to do trainings I said it was like stacking panes of glass, each one could be fairly clear but stack several and the view becomes less so. Plus of course each stage amplifies the noise of the stages before (well maybe not the preamp depending on design. I fondly recall my little NAD of yore with its volume control range switch. - All this is why our for our next move from the Denon AVR-X3600H we want to find external power amps with like at least 10 dB less residual noise.* How to check that I don't know because I've never seen anybody measure that. Denon AVR-X3600H AV Receiver Review measures SINAD but no residual hiss noise measurement that I see. *and ideally 3-channel, and at minimum 300W/channel at 4 ohms. Any nominees?
I don't understand why you think i'm talking about human ear ... i'm talking about "real life" dynamic range ... the dynamic range that you will hear from your recording and speakers / acoustics / noise floor. I repeat ... i don't talk about theorical numbers on whatever (ear / amplifier / sources / ...). Theorical dynamic range is one thing, real dynamic range in your room have other numbers. better SQ it's not about any isolated parameter.
Well residual hiss will be slightly different for all systems depending on connection quality, cable routing and sources of interference such as a transformer anywhere within a couple feet of low-level circuitry. As for self-noise, there exist some components that have none, for all practical purposes.
Yet to see how they will fare but I went from tubes to Hypex Ncore and I haven't looked back. Technologies keep emerging...
IDK about your room but mine is extremely quiet, quiet enough to hear a mouse fart, so these seemingly minute differences are quite audible.
Dynamic range is defined differently for Class AB and D, not comparable. AB 10 log((S + N ) / N) dB (S + N)/N = S/N + 1 S/N is in the x00,000,000 range so the +1 can be ignored So dynamic range is ~ S/N Class D Largest discrete power package/smallest This is determined by switching time since output is PWM (constant magnitude and varying duration, the product is power magnitude when integrated by an inductive load/filters). Basically the largest signal magnitude/smallest... (NOT noise). Noise is moot with a switching device. These should not be confused with audible dynamic range. If background level is 40 dBZ (pretty quiet) and music peaks are 110 dBZ (loud), dynamic range is 70 dB, about the best you can get in a home.
Here's a Class D example, numbers make it clearer sometimes. amp switching rate 10000/sec Assume pulse is 1 V and takes 1 sec of switches or 10000 to get 1 V. 0 = no signal 1/10000 = smallest signal or 0.0001 V 10000/10000 = largest signal 20 log ((10000/10000) / (1/10000) ) = 80 dB dynamic range
That's what i try to show ... maybe with math is more clear Then, you have the dynamic range existent in the recording (you can't improve that) ... and the dynamic range that your speakers can show (you can't improve that) ... and all the fantastic theorized number bytes the dust. It's crystal clear in my opinion, even without the math.
What will be heard? The limitation is the room and the source For a given background level and max SPL it will be the same? You will not hear a difference between 100 or 110 SN or dynamic range. My amp, DAC input, no signal, 100% volume 0.1 mV at the speakers. That can't be heard Nor can you listen at 100% volume 140 W...for long
I have a quiet room, you won't hear a peep out of my Marantz 30. Top brands wouldn't be putting "class D" in their premium products if it didn't meet their standards.
Surely can be a very good amplifier ... but it's about the dynamic range capability? If you like measurements, check the dynamic range in your recording ... with a digital recording it's pretty easy.