Sinatra / Capitol Sound Quality and General Discussion - Come Dance with Me (released 1959)*

Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by serge, Nov 15, 2009.

  1. roda12

    roda12 WATERTOWN FOREVER

    Location:
    Berlin, Germany
    Can someone tell me which mix of "Cheek to cheek" was used for "Songs from the heart"? Was this an existing mix? Was that mix ever released in complete album form? Very dry orchestra version!
     
    Last edited: May 30, 2018
  2. CBackley

    CBackley Chairman of the Bored


    They’re his homunculi.
     
  3. MLutthans

    MLutthans That's my spaghetti, Chewbacca! Staff

    The little guy in the tux does resemble Wally Shawn. ("Annie Hall" reference.)
     
    David*M likes this.
  4. Tommyboy

    Tommyboy Senior Member

    Location:
    New York
    Another newbie question. A few weeks ago I bought the Furmanek/Walsh CD set, the Capitol Years. The song Come Dance With Me sounds so much better on this CD than the same track on the MFSL album or the latest Capitol reissue. Not as much echo on Sinatra’s voice. Is the version on the Capitol Years CD a remix or was a better source used?

    It could be selective hearing on my part.
     
  5. MMM

    MMM Forum Hall Of Fame

    Location:
    Lodi, New Jersey
    It does. That was a new remix for the set, along with "Saturday Night". For whatever reason, "Just In Time" and "The Song Is You" retained the narrow remix/blah sound from the '87 CD, but the other two songs have much better sound on the mixes done for the set.
     
  6. Tommyboy

    Tommyboy Senior Member

    Location:
    New York
    Thanks Martin!
     
    MMM likes this.
  7. wvk3

    wvk3 Senior Member

    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    I was just listening to "Come Dance With Me" and "Saturday Night" on the Capitol Years set as well. I agree that they sound much better, but it sounds like the channels are reversed. Is that correct?
     
    MMM likes this.
  8. Tommyboy

    Tommyboy Senior Member

    Location:
    New York
    Martin - MMM is the expert. I’m a newbie.
     
  9. wvk3

    wvk3 Senior Member

    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Matt answered my question a while back.
     
  10. MLutthans

    MLutthans That's my spaghetti, Chewbacca! Staff

    To be clear, @MMM is the one who first pointed that out around here, at least the first one who told me. (Credit where credit's due, as they say.)
     
    MMM likes this.
  11. wvk3

    wvk3 Senior Member

    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    But of course :)

    I only noticed this now because I decided to make my own version of this album. I just got a nice copy of the 1984 Dell UK LP, so I made a lossless rip of that. Then I used Audacity to correct the reversed channels on "Saturday Night" in the Capitol Years set and substituted that for the defective track on the LP. I also tacked on the session chatter at the beginning of "Come Dance With Me" just for kicks. It shouldn't be this hard!
     
    MLutthans likes this.
  12. MLutthans

    MLutthans That's my spaghetti, Chewbacca! Staff

    But it's Sinatra! It has to be as confusing and challenging as possible! :agree::laugh:
     
    paulmock and wvk3 like this.
  13. Barolojoe

    Barolojoe Forum Resident

    Hello from Heidelberg,

    I have the original Dutch Mono edition from 1959 of 'Come Dance With Me' with the old grey Capitol Label in my collection.

    Coversleeve & Vinyl both in VG++ (excellent) condition.
    It's a very thick & heavy LP (Vinyl about 220 g) in top quality, shiny and planar .

    Below two photos:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
     
    BluRayVen, MLutthans, McLover and 5 others like this.
  14. BluRayVen

    BluRayVen Well-Known Member

    Location:
    New Mexico
    Hey everyone, I don't know what other forum to post this in so I'll put it here (sorry if it's high-jacking the thread). Those who are familiar with the label designs of Capitol records know they altered the design ever 3-5 years. I can't remember where if some forum or website that explained the reason for the different in the label layout as shown here where one label has a track above the spindle and another has 2 tracks but to summarize what I remember 'a pressing plant would have a production run of say 1/4 to 1/2 a million, but if sales were higher then the amount made and they needed to make more for that year the label would be changed to reflect a different production run, all tracks under the spindle is the 1st production, 1 track above the spindle is 2nd, 2 tracks is 3rd, and so on'.

    Can anyone substantiate this. again I can't find where i read this and I wouldn't know what to google even though I've tried. It makes since, consider the first photo, according to https://www.friktech.com/btls/capitol/capitollabels.pdf that label with the Capitol logo at 9 O'clock and the and&down spires was made between 1960-62. there could have been 3 production runs during that time and the track layout could indicate which production run it was. I need to know if anyone has some explanation for these designs because for the last 5 years I have been making and editing submission on Discogs stating "all tracks under the spindle is the 1st production" ect. Now I have some know it all undoing my work removing these notes calling them fantasy.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  15. MMM

    MMM Forum Hall Of Fame

    Location:
    Lodi, New Jersey
    The plain "1" labels are East Coast, while the "1" with a hat are West Coast. Not sure about the change re placement for one or two tracks above the spindle hole on those 9 o'clock labels. Possibly just a change made but each variant kept being used? @W.B. might know. None of these are original...1st copies have the LONG PLAYING HIGH FIDELITY black/rainbow labels, with the different colorband. On the 12 o'clock versions you posted, not the change is due to removing the credit for Sinatra's Essex Productions.
     
    MLutthans likes this.
  16. W.B.

    W.B. The Collector's Collector

    Location:
    New York, NY, USA
    The 'spires' label was Aug 1959-Dec 1961, and the logo at 12 o'clock from Jan 1962 to Jul 1968 (that is, non-Subsidiary; if you count that, then up to Aug 1969).

    Clearly, there were different printing runs within the 'spires' era of (S)W-1069:
    [​IMG]
    The second and third examples are Bert-Co of Los Angeles, and the spacing differences (never mind how many tracks were listed atop the spindle hole) are among the wonders of letterpress printing. :winkgrin: The first was typeset by Keystone Printed Specialties of Scranton.
    [​IMG]
    The sets at right may've come first, given the justified-left spacing for Billy May's credit (as opposed to justified center on the copy sans Essex Productions credit).
     
    MLutthans and Simon A like this.
  17. W.B.

    W.B. The Collector's Collector

    Location:
    New York, NY, USA
    Another thing I noticed: The stereo Scranton CDWM listed song running times, the mono Scranton (and all L.A.) didn't.
     
    Simon A likes this.
  18. W.B.

    W.B. The Collector's Collector

    Location:
    New York, NY, USA
    Here are a few Scrantons from 1962, mono / stereo:
    [​IMG] [​IMG]

    [​IMG] [​IMG]
    Have yet to see a stereo Scranton with the Essex reference amongst this bunch. (No doubt the times would have accompanied the songs.) Of the stereo labels, the one at right was from after the one at left . . . the cat. # typeface and line spacing dates it to about 1963.l
     
    Simon A and MLutthans like this.
  19. McLover

    McLover Senior Member

    I have a CD era letter to add to this quotable of the week. VNST (*verified Norberged sonic turd) which goes VST and then some. (big grins)
     
  20. fortherecord

    fortherecord Senior Member

    Location:
    Rochester, NY
    Were the mixes changed and reverb add on the later pressings?
     
  21. Artur Torres

    Artur Torres New Improved Full Dimensional Stereo

    Location:
    Brazil
    So far, the best mastering I've found from "Cheek to Cheek" is in the 2007 "Romance - Songs From the Heart" collection. Dave McEowen was a remastering engineer on this project. The highs are good, tailor-made, Frank's voice is very natural with little reverb and the conductor has a little more sound presence than many LP and CD releases of "Come Swing With Me."

     
    roda12 likes this.
  22. roda12

    roda12 WATERTOWN FOREVER

    Location:
    Berlin, Germany
    Perfectly right! Wished there would be a complete album release with this mastering!
     
    Artur Torres likes this.
  23. Artur Torres

    Artur Torres New Improved Full Dimensional Stereo

    Location:
    Brazil
    Ops... Come "Dance" With Me.
     
    fortherecord likes this.
  24. KarlFarbman

    KarlFarbman Forum Resident

    Location:
    Fargo
    So I tried to somewhat speed read through this thread in order to find out the consensus on the best sounding CD of Come Dance With Me. Most of the discussion centers around the vinyl pressings. So is there a consensus that the best sounding CD version is the Walsh version only available in a now OOP UK box set? Or was there a standalone version of that same disc released? Is the Capitol version released some years ago in the US, ie the generally available one, considered that much of a failure?
     
  25. Bob F

    Bob F Senior Member

    Location:
    Massachusetts USA
    1. The Walsh version is NOT the one in the “now OOP UK box set” (Sinatra: The Capitol Years from 1998).

    2. The Walsh disc (1987) is a stereo remix which is not as good as some vinyl versions, but it is probably the “best CD by default” according to Matt’s (@MLutthans) Capitol Scorecard. (Matt’s album review: Come Dance with Me - recorded 1958.) The Walsh CD is still available new in the UK: Amazon UK link.

    3. Answering the last question about the currently available US CD (1998 Norberg version): Avoid!
     

Share This Page

molar-endocrine