Black Sabbath's Vol. 4: Best sounding version?

Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by Agent of Fortune, Jul 9, 2015.

  1. MONOLOVER

    MONOLOVER Forum Resident

    Location:
    UPPSALA, SWEDEN
    Had the UK Vertigo 1st long time ago, but on another equipment. This WB does it for me for now. If I should stumble over another UK I'll try it for sure, but till then this is good enough for me :)
     
  2. Thomas Brophy

    Thomas Brophy Forum Resident

    Location:
    ireland
    The early WWA volume 4 has the Vertigo catalogue numbers on the run off crossed out with a line through it and the WWA catalogue number etched after it. It sounds superb. You can hear Iommi's fingers dragging on the strings as he changes chords.
    The early NEMS version of the first Black Sabbath album has the WWA catalogue number on the runoff and the Nems catalogue number etched after it. It comes on a substantial slap of vinyl and sounds terrific.
     
    razorball and hi_watt like this.
  3. curbach

    curbach Some guy on the internet

    Location:
    The ATX
    Funny you should quote the long-departed Jeff Carney as an authority here. You should look up what he had to say about your beloved Black Box :)
     
    jon9091 likes this.
  4. AaronW

    AaronW Senior Member

    Location:
    Los Angeles
    I had the WWA Volume 4 with the Vertigo numbers crossed out (second cut, no Porky/Pecko) and liked the original US olive label pressing better. Same goes for the NEMS version of the first Black Sabbath album with the WWA catalogue number in the deadwax. I do prefer the WWA/Vertigo Paranoid and WWA Sabbath Bloody Sabbath to their US counterparts though.
     
  5. Neilson77

    Neilson77 Forum Resident

    Location:
    Nottingham UK
    I realise most here don't like the compression and it being a bit bright but other versions of Vol. 4 sound muddy and muffled with a veiled sound. I don't know how anyone can like the 2009 Sanctuary Pearce remaster, that's the worst I've heard. Tape dropouts and its just dead sounding.
     
  6. kevin5brown

    kevin5brown Analog or bust.

    I just saw this. This actually doesn't seem like Jeff talking, unless you're paraphrasing? I kept up with him for a little while after he left here, and I always remembered that his punctuation was better than this. ;) Maybe you could provide a link?
     
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2015
  7. motionoftheocean

    motionoftheocean Senior Member

    Location:
    Circus Maximus
    As your descriptions have yet to in any way accurately describe the contents, I have to say I'm not convinced you've actually heard the Pearce. Are you sure you didn't "obtain" some poorly labeled files?
     
    ricks likes this.
  8. kevin5brown

    kevin5brown Analog or bust.

    ^^^ This. Only TE and NSD of the Pearces sound really horrible.
     
  9. Neilson77

    Neilson77 Forum Resident

    Location:
    Nottingham UK
    I cut and pasted it
     
  10. Neilson77

    Neilson77 Forum Resident

    Location:
    Nottingham UK
    The CD I heard was part of the UK Ozzy Years Complete Albums set released in 2010 which im pretty sure has the Pearce remasters? Universal/Sanctuary release.
     
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2015
  11. Agent of Fortune

    Agent of Fortune Däncing Barefoot Thread Starter

    Supposedly they used the wrong final masters for those, and the 'real' Pearce remasters are in the vault somewhere. If that's true, I'm absolutely baffled as to why this hasn't been corrected.

    Link to Discogs or Amazon or something like that?
     
  12. kevin5brown

    kevin5brown Analog or bust.

    You should be able to provide a link. :)
     
  13. Neilson77

    Neilson77 Forum Resident

    Location:
    Nottingham UK
    http://www.discogs.com/Black-Sabbat...et-Limited-Collectors-Edition/release/2894190

    With the Pearce Vol. 4 you lose so much detail/resolution. Same with the US Rhino 180G Vinyl I have mastered by Chris Bellman. Nothing beats the UK Porky tho!
     
  14. Woodhill78

    Woodhill78 Forum Resident

    Location:
    Norway
    I got a 1972 french swirl (6360 071) and i have compared it to the Japan SHM-CD.
    The cd sounds thin and harsh , in comparison.(too much treble) The vinyl has more meat , (better lower end) sounds powerful , the way Sabbath is meant to sound. Never heard the porky though.
     
  15. Tim1954

    Tim1954 Forum Resident

    Location:
    Cincinnati, OH
    The SHM-SACD is the one people are talking about. No SHM CD is anything from tape.
     
  16. Vinyl Fan 1973

    Vinyl Fan 1973 "They're like soup, they're like....nothing bad"

    Couldn't disagree more. I have the SHM CD and it sounds fantastic. Not thin or harsh on my system. I think this album is a mess sound wise and I've heard many versions and none of them are all that great. I even had a minty original Australian swirl and I thought it sounded meh!

    I find it comical how people go on about the vinyl pressings of that album, they just aren't very good.
     
  17. old school

    old school Senior Member

    I agree I have the first three Black Sabbath deluxe editions on the SHM format and they sound great too me.
     
    danielbravo and Vinyl Fan 1973 like this.
  18. Tim1954

    Tim1954 Forum Resident

    Location:
    Cincinnati, OH

    Nonsense. I've got some vinyl pressings of Vol. 4 that will shake the foundations of the earth.

    "Snowblind" on the original Porky cut Vertigo, for example, is simply INCREDIBLE!

    The problem with the SHM's (non-SACD) is that they are just taken from the Castle remaster or the Pearce remaster, so what's the point unless someone likes looking at an obi strip?
     
    ODShowtime and rnranimal like this.
  19. rnranimal

    rnranimal Senior Member

    Location:
    Ohio
    This. Most SHM-CDs are the biggest rip off. Inflated prices for old masterings usually still available for peanuts. Sometimes they are the exact same and other times they add in some EQ, compression, limiting, etc. I was very disappointed to find the Syd Barrett ones to be nothing but loudened versions of the 90s remasters.
     
    jsayers likes this.
  20. RickA

    RickA Love you forever Luke, we will be together again

    Location:
    Tampa, FL
    The SHM SACD of Vol. 4 is my go to disc.

    Rick A.
     
    leonafonte likes this.
  21. rnranimal

    rnranimal Senior Member

    Location:
    Ohio
    Throw Paranoid on that list since it uses the 1996 Ray Staff mastering. Either Pearce didn't do a mastering for that one for some reason or it's also on that shelf. One of the major audio disappointments was buying the deluxe in expectation of finally getting a proper mastering of the album as well as the quad mix, only to be greeted with the too bright/thin 1996 mastering and what sounds like an awful needle drop of the quad album. I don't know why I was so silly, but I expected a new CD mastering since it was credited to Pearce and the quad to be sourced from tape.
     
    wrat and Agent of Fortune like this.
  22. Agent of Fortune

    Agent of Fortune Däncing Barefoot Thread Starter

    There's no excuse! Do you think they even know about this?
     
  23. rnranimal

    rnranimal Senior Member

    Location:
    Ohio
    I have no idea what went on with the Paranoid deluxe using the '96. Who's decision? Was it an error? Does Pearce even know? I know he addressed the sound of TE and NSD and how that's not how he mastered them, but don't recall anything being mentioned about Paranoid.

    The quad, I know what happened, it's just very disappointing they would do that instead of making the effort to do it right. WB holds the quad master. Just like they hold the master for "Wicked World" and Euro CDs have always been using a poorly done needle drop. I don't if they refuse to share or if the UK labels have bee unwilling to spring for a fee to use the tapes.
     
  24. Brian Ramone

    Brian Ramone Well-Known Member

  25. Agent of Fortune

    Agent of Fortune Däncing Barefoot Thread Starter

    Well that explains the weird sound on the 96 and 04 Castle CDs.... Is this also true for the 2010 2-CD S/T remaster?
     

Share This Page

molar-endocrine