What is the most important artist in the music history?

Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by Claus, Nov 7, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Claus

    Claus Senior Member Thread Starter

    Location:
    Germany
    With all respect to the others... I think Frank Sinatra is my favorite!
     
  2. Depends what's your pick I guess. I like guitar stuff, which brings Jimi Hendrix on top for me.....
     
  3. Matti Saari

    Matti Saari Senior Finn

    Location:
    Vantaa, Finland
    I vote for Hedrix also.

    Matti
     
  4. Sean Keane

    Sean Keane Pre-Mono record collector In Memoriam

    Frank Sinatra.
     
  5. peterC

    peterC Aussie Addict

    Location:
    sydney
    We are talking about popular music of the 20th century, right?

    The Beatles of course was far more than the sum of its parts and perhaps should be included as an "artist" in its own right rather than John and Paul individually.
     
  6. Beatle Terr

    Beatle Terr Super Senior SH Forum Member Musician & Guitarist

    I have to agree with Peter, Hence I can't vote on this one with just Paul and Johns names there!:(
     
  7. Claus

    Claus Senior Member Thread Starter

    Location:
    Germany
    I think Lennon/McCartney belong to the most important artists... but George and Ringo are not on the same rank like Elvis or Sinatra (IMHO).

    I hope that's not a sacrilege against all Beatles fans here.
     
  8. LtPepper

    LtPepper Forum Resident

    Location:
    New Jersey
    Have to agree with Peter.

    If you are talking about the most popular individual, then that may be a different story. Then I may go with Jimi Hendrix.
     
  9. Mark

    Mark I Am Gort, Hear Me Roar Staff

    If I understand the poll question correctly, it's not who is our favorite, but who we think was most important, presumably to the growth and expansion of popular music. If I have that right, I can't see any other answer than Elvis. Sinatra was popular in his own right, but Elvis blew the doors off the music, merging "black" music into "white" households, making it "popular." The others who followed did that in their own ways, but clearly Elvis was, well, "The King."
     
  10. Claus

    Claus Senior Member Thread Starter

    Location:
    Germany
    Mark... you're right :thumbsup: that was my question!
     
  11. reechie

    reechie Senior Member

    Location:
    Baltimore
    Can't and won't vote unless "The Beatles" are added.

    It wasn't Lennon or McCartney, any more than Harrison or Starkey. The sum of those four individuals was greater than the individual parts. None of them would have had the same impact without the others. Therefore The Beatles, as a unit, should be added to the ballot.
     
  12. teaser5

    teaser5 Cool Rockin' Daddy

    Location:
    The DMV
    Da Vinci

    Peace-
    Norm
     
  13. Graham Start

    Graham Start Forum Resident

    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
  14. Roland Stone

    Roland Stone Offending Member

    Well, Louis Armstrong, Charlie Parker, and Miles Davis would have to be on the short list.

    It's interesting, Claus, that you included Frank Zappa. He's far more revered in Europe than in his home country. I've met other Europeans who rate him as highly. While he does have a dedicated following in the U.S., most American listeners probably wouldn't include him on a list like this if given one hundred entries, if they even thought of him at all.
     
  15. 120dB

    120dB Forum Resident

    Location:
    Baltimore, MD
    Most important?

    Enrico Caruso, probably.
    He made the "record" an
    artform "way back when"...
     
  16. Mike V

    Mike V New Member

    Location:
    Connecticut
    Ellington. He was and forever will be unsurpassed.
     
  17. Bach, Beethoven, Mozart, etc.
    Duke Ellington
    Rolling Stones, The Who
    Brian Wilson

    Apologies to Claus. Don't mean to thread crap.
     
  18. vex

    vex New Member

    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Johann Sebastian Bach
     
  19. John B

    John B Once Blue Gort,<br>now just blue.

    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    Claus left a space for "others" so your answer looks good. It's hard to pick one.
     
  20. Ken_McAlinden

    Ken_McAlinden MichiGort Staff

    Location:
    Livonia, MI
    That was what I was thinking when I selected "other", as well.

    Regards,
     
  21. guy incognito

    guy incognito Senior Member

    Location:
    Mee-chigan
    I assume as much. In which case, my vote goes to Louis Armstrong.
     
  22. -=Rudy=-

    -=Rudy=- ♪♫♪♫♫♪♪♫♪♪ Staff

    Location:
    US
    I can't vote for a "most important" since music is constantly changing and evolving. Elvis may have broken down doors, but then he was followed by the Lennon/McCartney era which began the songwriting era, IMHO. In other words, artists wrote and recorded (even produced) most of their own music, vs. covering hits by established tunesmiths like the Brill Building. One could also further argue that the Sugarhill Gang was the first "rap" group...maybe not THE first, but the first that had a recognizable, well known hit that opened the floodgates for all that followed.
     
  23. teaser5

    teaser5 Cool Rockin' Daddy

    Location:
    The DMV
    Oh...MUSIC History!

    Dylan

    Peace

    Norm
     
  24. Claus

    Claus Senior Member Thread Starter

    Location:
    Germany
    Re: Oh...MUSIC History!

    you're right... I missed Bob! :realmad:
     
  25. hoboken lad

    hoboken lad New Member

    Location:
    hoboken, NJ
    Gotta vote for the Beatles; much more important together than as individual artists. Plus the social impact the Beatles brought was greater than Elvis (although his and Sinatra's social influences were pretty great, too).
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

molar-endocrine