Best free (or not too pricey) tool to resample?

Discussion in 'Audio Hardware' started by fredhammersmith, Dec 1, 2022.

  1. fredhammersmith

    fredhammersmith Forum Resident Thread Starter

    Location:
    Montreal, Quebec
    Hi.
    I bought some hires albums at 24/192 but I realize using my Metric Halo ULN-2 or my software (JRiver) to resample to 24/96 in real time may not be the best practice. Any advice on a good software to resample? I am not a pro, so I would prefer not spending hundreds of bucks for just a dozen albums!
     
  2. harby

    harby Forum Resident

    Location:
    Portland, OR, USA
    SoX. command line utility.

    sox.exe −G hires.flac outfile.flac rate 96000


    Substitute 48000 and hear no difference.
     
  3. Boltman92124

    Boltman92124 Go Padres!!

    Location:
    San Diego
    What's wrong with JRiver? I think it does a nice job with whatever resampling is needed.
     
  4. fredhammersmith

    fredhammersmith Forum Resident Thread Starter

    Location:
    Montreal, Quebec
    Well, actually, I'll test it. It may be that I just think it is not good enough.
     
  5. fredhammersmith

    fredhammersmith Forum Resident Thread Starter

    Location:
    Montreal, Quebec
    What is the -G parameter?
     
  6. Archimago

    Archimago Forum Resident

    If you need to spend some money, you can also get iZotope RX which IMO is best in class.

    High quality resampling in software is trivial these days whether through SoX, Foobar, or commercial software like JRiver and dBPowerAmp.

    Would be very surprised if one could hear a difference between them!
     
    Ingenieur likes this.
  7. Boltman92124

    Boltman92124 Go Padres!!

    Location:
    San Diego
    It does what you tell it to do. If I'm using my vintage Adcom DAC, I set it up to 44.1/48khz for 96/192 files. You can upsample as well.
     
  8. harby

    harby Forum Resident

    Location:
    Portland, OR, USA
    It's supposed to automatically reduce file gain if clipping is detected (which can happen from any filtering), but doesn't always seem to work as magically as one would hope.
     
  9. fredhammersmith

    fredhammersmith Forum Resident Thread Starter

    Location:
    Montreal, Quebec
    xx
    Good to know.
    I used to love to test things.
    Now, not so much.
     
  10. harby

    harby Forum Resident

    Location:
    Portland, OR, USA
    "best in class" except when actually analyzed: SRC Comparisons
     
  11. Kal Rubinson

    Kal Rubinson Senior Member

    Location:
    NYC
    Jriver uses SoX for resampling. Built in.
     
  12. pscreed

    pscreed Upstanding Member

    Location:
    Land of the Free
    Good software development practice… why reinvent the wheel?
     
    TarnishedEars and patient_ot like this.
  13. Designsfx

    Designsfx Forum Resident

    Location:
    Los Angeles
  14. rockclassics

    rockclassics Senior Member

    Location:
    Mainline Florida

Share This Page

molar-endocrine