Best Speakers for hearing Linda Ronstadt

Discussion in 'Audio Hardware' started by heartbreaker, May 13, 2021.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Ken Clark

    Ken Clark Forum Resident

    Location:
    Chicago Suburbs
    Klipsch Cornwalls with a good 45SET amp. Holographic.
     
  2. Ted Torres Jr

    Ted Torres Jr Synergistic Maximus

    Location:
    SE LA
    HB,

    Heard Linda live in the 80's doing gigs with the Nelson Riddle Orchestra...Her voice complimented that genre Very Nicely! :love:

    Not sure what your budget is but for a superb dollar value, might I suggest THESE that have a great and balanced mid-range sound!! :righton:

    Ted
     
    caracallac and heartbreaker like this.
  3. DrZhivago

    DrZhivago Hedonist

    Location:
    Brisbane Australia
    :D
     
  4. Francois1968

    Francois1968 Forum Resident

    Location:
    Netherlands
    If you are looking for gear to make one specific genre sound good, let alone one singer, something is wrong.........Good audio components can play any genre. People who state something totally different are mixing up preferences with facts.
     
  5. Ted Torres Jr

    Ted Torres Jr Synergistic Maximus

    Location:
    SE LA
    Agreed...was thinking this, should have been my 1st response! :righton:

    Ted
     
    Francois1968 likes this.
  6. Retro Music Man

    Retro Music Man Forum Resident

    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    This thread has given me an idea. Maybe I should build a new system to get the most out of my extensive Kate Bush collection...
     
    heartbreaker and bever70 like this.
  7. Hardcore

    Hardcore Quartz Controlled

    Location:
    UK
    I’d imagine she’s a lot smoother on wax.
     
  8. Tim Irvine

    Tim Irvine Forum Resident

    Location:
    Austin, Texas
    Towers big enough to snuggle.
     
  9. McLover

    McLover Senior Member

    Big issues: Quite a few Linda Ronstadt LP discs (and their digital counterparts) were mixed with the Aphex Aural Exciter) and also suffer from Val Garay's engineering. Therefore, very processed (I also happen to like the music).
     
    bluemooze, grx8 and heartbreaker like this.
  10. Helom

    Helom Forum member

    Location:
    U.S.
    I find panel speakers do voices best, especially concerning minute vocal inflections that an inexperienced listener probably wouldn’t notice. Possibly, this is because the diaphragms are closer in mass to human cords than are a typical dynamic-cone driver. Planar-magnetics like Magnepans are not the best for absolute resolution but they are hard to top in the midrange freqs. They also get timbre correct when setup properly. Martin Logan ESLs can produce more detail but are somewhat lacking in the natural body and weight of a human voice IME. I can’t speak for Quads, but the old-timers I know locally swear by the ESL 57s.
     
    Doug_B and bever70 like this.
  11. Sterling1

    Sterling1 Forum Resident

    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    [​IMG]
    I have been enjoying Linda via JBL L100t3's since 1986 and now, since installing a 2.1 Parasound P6 Preamplifier/DAC, bass management to my JBL B380 makes Linda Ronstadt, as well as my other favored female vocalists, like Diana Krall, sound even more life like.
     
    bluemooze and heartbreaker like this.
  12. avanti1960

    avanti1960 Forum Resident

    Location:
    Chicago metro, USA
    lacking any specifics of the seating and speaker layout of the relatively large room-

    listening large, e.g. 60 feet away along the length of your room you will need some speakers that are efficient and capable of higher SPL.
    klipsch heritage are the obvious choice, la scalas or cornwalls will do nicely, even forte iv. they will project a huge sound in that room arrangement, sound live as if delivered by a concert hall PA system, yet lack some refinement and transparency of other speakers and are not the ultimate female vocal speaker.
    avante garde speakers are a big step up on this theme but are much more expensive.

    listening medium large, e.g. 30 feet away would still be best suited to higher efficiency horn speakers unless you want to upgrade your amplifier power significantly.

    litening medium, e.g. 15 to 20 feet away opens up some other possibilities that zero in on female vocals.
    the spendor D7.2 towers are fast, relatively efficient and slightly forward leaning, image with precision and have a clear hi res sound which would spotlight linda extremely well.
    if you have a big budget single driver speakers like Voxative is about the best you can do for female vocals. i was literally amazed when i heard Voxatives playing female soprano.
    the Harbeth SHL5+ are right up there with the spendors and have stunning, slightly forward clarity perfect for linda.

    listening nearfield, e.g. 10 feet away, the Spendors and Harbeths still work but you also have the option of the entry level single driver Voxative boxes which are again the best speakers for incredibly real female vocals.
     
    WapatoWolf and heartbreaker like this.
  13. heartbreaker

    heartbreaker Prisoner in Disguise Thread Starter

    Location:
    UK
    Exactly! When I find a good recording, it shows the difference. My quest is to make the poor sound good!
     
  14. David Sonnier

    David Sonnier Forum Resident

    Location:
    Broussard LA
    I’d recommend Zu Omens (Dirty Weekend). The voice is incredibly accurate in Zu speakers.

    Another good speaker for budget purpose.. Klipsch RP series towers. RP-6000/8000
    Older ones are cheap in used market
     
    heartbreaker likes this.
  15. heartbreaker

    heartbreaker Prisoner in Disguise Thread Starter

    Location:
    UK
    Furthest I sit away is 15 feet (5 yards). My room is soft furnished; carpet, upholstery, curtains. Plaster walls with bookcases. Stone fireplace. Metal radiator. TV (plasma) on a cabinet.

    I want Linda singing on the floor (standing up!) in front of me, or closer!
     
    bluemooze and grx8 like this.
  16. heartbreaker

    heartbreaker Prisoner in Disguise Thread Starter

    Location:
    UK
    15 on July 15th!
     
  17. head_unit

    head_unit Senior Member

    Location:
    Los Angeles CA USA
    As someone noted, 2.1 = Left, Right, and the 0.1 is a subwoofer. The reason 0.1 refers to a subwoofer is related to the limited-bandwidth low frequency channel used in cinemas for special effects woofers.

    A centere channel will not help the recordings you have at all. There are just a couple 5.1 titles, albeit really wonderful ones:
    https://www.discogs.com/Linda-Ronstadt-The-Nelson-Riddle-Orchestra-Whats-New/release/4291883
    https://www.discogs.com/Linda-Ronst...omantic-Evening-In-Old-Mexico/release/9596599
    I was thinking there was another but I have to check my bins.

    She sounds great on an all-Focal setup (936, CC900, SR900, with the center boosted +1 dB compared to the raw Audyssey settings).

    Now as @Boltman92124 asked, what do you feel is lacking with your Diamond 9.1? I have Diamond 11.4 in two different systems and while they are not quite the Focal they are quite nice. Stereophile sure loved yours:
    Wharfedale Diamond 9.1 loudspeaker
    BUT. At one place the 11.4 do indeed sound somewhat recessed, I'm going to put a slight mid-boost when I get some new shelves made. At the other location, they don't sound recessed at all.
    (1) Maybe what you need is going to 3-way up from 2-way. I can tell you as a loudspeaker engineer that having a crossover in the middle of the vocal range is never the recipe for the utmost clarity. Even if the on-axis response is flat there will mathematically be a dip in the total power response (though a few designs can manage to mostly avoid this).
    (2) Some PICTURES of your setup and room would be very relevant. It is quite possibly not a speaker problem at all! It could well be the room and/or positioning within
     
    Last edited: May 14, 2021
  18. rebellovw

    rebellovw Forum Resident

    Location:
    hell
    Hold on let me check....

    Linda Ronstadt......

    Cornwalls.
     
  19. ltusler

    ltusler Forum Resident

    Location:
    Minneapolis
    I see your Cornwalls and raise you Jubilee's.

    Yes, I checked.
     
    WapatoWolf, Ntotrar and rebellovw like this.
  20. Blzebub

    Blzebub Active Member

    Location:
    UK
    ATC SCM150ASLTs
     
    heartbreaker likes this.
  21. caracallac

    caracallac Forum Resident

    Location:
    Ireland
    Another possibility for a smaller room is a pair of these.
    [​IMG]

    Driven by one of these,
    [​IMG]

    Or one of these.
    [​IMG]

    Either combination will do Linda’s voice the justice it deserves.
     
    bluemooze and heartbreaker like this.
  22. LakeMountain

    LakeMountain Vinyl surfer

    Location:
    Netherlands
    You may be banking too much on speakers. To make a voice well defined in front of you and come away from instruments and orchestra you need a good chain. I achieved it by adding a power filter and a good power cable to my hybrid integrated amp. I even use a quantum noise suppressor, which gives a voice just this extra little bit of definition and expression. Linda (and all other good singers) sound magic.

    However there is a danger, after setting up a good chain you may not like your headphones anymore!
     
    heartbreaker likes this.
  23. heartbreaker

    heartbreaker Prisoner in Disguise Thread Starter

    Location:
    UK
    Good article. I have no problem with other music, just wanting Linda "on my lap" or at arm's reach. Its those recordings up to and including "Mad Love", though ML is halfway OK.
     
  24. heartbreaker

    heartbreaker Prisoner in Disguise Thread Starter

    Location:
    UK
    Go for it! :edthumbs:
     
    Blzebub and caracallac like this.
  25. Fruff76

    Fruff76 L100 Classic - Fan Club President

    This.
     
    heartbreaker and blowinblue like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

molar-endocrine